Posts, Articles, Writings and Musings

Georgia Election Officials Admit To 2020 Fraud

The State Election Board admits that Fulton County violated election law

By Emerald Robinson

Citizen journalist Joe Rossi showed up at the Georgia State Capitol yesterday for the State Election Board meeting to announce that America’s corrupt voting system had finally been caught beyond a shadow of a doubt.


It’s now been proven that Fulton County’s hand audit and the certified machine count are both in violation of Georgia’s election law.

That’s right: Georgia’s State Election Board has been forced to admit in writing that Fulton County cheated.

That’s not all.

Garland Favorito delivered the death-blow to America’s electronic voting systems by exposing the fact that Georgia’s election officials were too stupid to understand the systems that they maintain.

Yes, that happened too.

There’s something called a “QR Code mismatch error” in these systems — which under-counts valid votes every time.

That error was found in almost every Georgia county in their 2020 vote totals.

Georgia Secretary of State Raffensperger’s lead attorney was forced to admit at the meeting that Fulton County used improper procedures in the 2020 election.

That’s a crime.

She was also forced to admit that Fulton County counted votes twice — which is also illegal.

So that’s two crimes.

So Georgia’s corrupt officials have been caught certifying false election results.

There’s 380,000 missing ballot images.

Fulton County cannot provide sufficient evidence of the votes it claimed it counted in 2020. The recount could not replicate those original results either.

The votes are missing because they don’t exist.

That’s because Joe Biden did not win the red state of Georgia in 2020.

Trump won.

And now the election fraud deniers are the real conspiracy theorists.

Summary of 2020 Presidential Election Fraud in 5 Swing States

“Three things cannot long be hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.” -Buddha

So, the cleanest election of all time, does not appear to be clean at all. Actually, it might be the most fraudulent election of all time in the US.

Below is a summary of the massive fraud and election tampering in the 7 swing states in 2020. I have also enclosed the PDF with footnote references and attributions for dissemination here.

We truly are being ruled by an illegitimate buffoon who actually performed the real insurrection. 81 million votes my ass. GITMO would be too good for him.

Introduction: It has often been repeated there is “no evidence” of fraud in the 2020 Election. In actuality, there is no evidence Joe Biden won.

Ongoing investigations in the Swing States reveal hundreds of thousands of votes were altered and/or not lawfully cast in the Presidential Election. Joe Biden needed them. On Election Night Nov. 3, 2020, President Donald J. Trump was sailing to reelection with landslide leads in numerous battlegrounds. In Georgia, President Trump was up by 12 points, and over 335,000 votes, with 56 percent of the vote in at 10:17 p.m. In Wisconsin, President Trump was leading by 121,380 votes and 5 points at 12:12 a.m., which Fox News anchor Bret Baier noted was “not a small margin.” In Pennsylvania, President Trump was leading by 659,145 votes at 12:38 a.m., a full 15 points. In Michigan, President Trump was leading by 293,052 votes and 10 points.

The election was over. However, precincts in Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, and Milwaukee kept counting until the results reached the desired outcome, which was the opposite of the will of the voters. Georgia went from having a total of 4.7 million votes, already a record for the state, according to Brad Raffensperger’s count on Nov. 4, to certifying almost 5 million. This was 300,000 more votes than what the top elections official claimed were cast in the Election.

Getting to this result in Georgia, and other states, created an irredeemably compromised Election, filled with violations of the Constitution, unlawful ballots, widespread broken chain of custody, electronic manipulation, and missing and corrupted election files that made it uncertifiable — and impossible to recreate the results.

President Trump was right to voice his objections to what had unfolded before the country’s eyes. Republican poll watchers were denied access to the counting in multiple jurisdictions and ballots were counted in secret in the middle of the night without media or observers present. Countless irregularities emerged, including reports of ineligible voters, voting machine anomalies, “water main breaks,” improbable percentages of ballots for Biden, and more.

Since, investigations across the country have uncovered an avalanche of irregularities, unlawful activity, manipulation of election records, destruction of evidence, and fraud. The findings, which are outcome determinative, are detailed in the summaries of the Swing States.


  • Georgia was called by 11,779 votes.
  • Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital record of all in person votes cast in its original results.
  • Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these 315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that tabulated them. This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast on each machine.
  • The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on Election Day, were destroyed.
  • The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and Fulton County, reported three different results.
  • Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine count but not the other.
  • Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden. Ballots that are blank except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.”
  • The second machine count was over 17,000 votes “short.” Fulton County was instructed to “reconcile” the results by the Secretary of State, and recertified its results without divulging the extent of the vote deficiency to members of the Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections.
  • “Thousands of bogus votes” were ultimately added into the Election results via the second machine count. This includes 20,977 unsubstantiated votes of unknown origin. The results were missing 17,852 ballot images, and included 3,125 duplicate ballot images that were counted twice.
  • At least 2,871 ballots were counted two or three times in the second machine count, totaling 6,118 questionable votes.
  • Eighty-eight percent of Fulton County’s precincts reported a different total number of votes between the first and second machine count.
  • The only electronic votes that survived from the first count were the mail-in ballots, since they were tabulated on the high speed scanner their ballot images were automatically uploaded to the election server.
  • Ninety percent of these approximately 148,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton County cannot be authenticated. Ballot images for 132,284 mail-in votes have no .SHA file, which is created automatically when a ballot is scanned and used to authenticate the digital image of the vote, lacking evidence they were scanned and tabulated properly, or even cast by a real voter.
  • 104,994 ballot image files of these mail-in ballots from the original count contained identical modified time stamps, suggesting electronic manipulation.
  • Fulton County does not know “how many voters cast votes” and its “lack of basic accounting controls make it impossible to determine who really won” in 2020, according to Philip Stark, a University of California, Berkeley professor who invented risk-limiting audits. Stark noted, “The electronic records of the election are not intact.”
  • 376,863 ballot images are missing from the first machine count, which includes all in-person votes in Fulton County.
  • None of the 315,000 votes cast during early voting in Fulton County were witnessed to and signed by the poll manager and two poll workers, as required by state election rules. The closing tapes for these votes are all unsigned, showed more tabulated votes than the tabulators had recorded as scanning in their protective counters, and recorded improbably low percentages for President Trump. For example, President Trump received only 0.9 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.7 percent from some of the tabulators, as if he was a third party candidate, or in a third world country. The anomalies indicate ballots were not scanned on the tabulators that printed the closing tapes, making the closing tapes fraudulent.
  • Tabulators used in Fulton County during early voting had their seals broken, and memory cards were reprogrammed and inserted into different scanners to count absentee ballots, in violation of election rules. This made it impossible to reconcile the true number of votes tabulated on the machines from the start of the Election to the end of counting.
  • 235,000 absentee ballots were requested and accepted too early, prior to the lawful date 180 days before the 2020 Election, which was May 6, 2020. These votes should have never been counted in the 2020 Election.
  • 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden were included in the hand count audit results for Fulton County. The false votes were the result of 36 accounting errors, which were confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp’s office and investigators working for Secretary Brad Raffensperger, yet they have never been removed from the official hand count results. These errors alone would reduce the margin to 7,698 votes.
  • The hand count audit included 3,935 unaccounted for votes due to 11 missing batch sheets in Fulton County. Differences from the original count to the hand audit total at least 15,690 votes, which is more than the entire election margin alone. This includes the 4,081 false Biden votes, plus “missing” votes discovered in Gwinett (1,642), Fayette (2,755), Floyd (2,700), Douglas (293), and Walton (284) counties that were likely due to machine counting errors.
  • Thousands of “pristine,” unfolded absentee ballots were counted during the hand count audit in Fulton County, according to at least six witnesses, which is the subject of ongoing litigation. These absentee ballots had no folds, and went 98 percent to Joe Biden, had “been added in a fraudulent manner,” witnesses said.
  • Fulton County certified 59,143 in-person votes on Election Day, despite the fact that only 14,152 people had voted as of 5 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2020. Evidence suggests the in-person vote total on Election Day was inflated by approximately 37,000 votes, as records show no rush to the polls during the final two hours of voting, and a screenshot of the in-person Election Day results shared by a government contractor showed only 21,843 people voted at the polls in Fulton County on Nov. 3.
  • Fulton County ordered over 1 million absentee ballots days before the 2020 Election, without any envelopes and the time necessary to mail. There were only 808,680 active voters in Fulton County as of Nov. 1, 2020, meaning the county had more blank mail-in ballots than the number of registered voters, and ordered them after the vast majority of mail-in ballot requests had already been sent to voters by Runbeck Election Services.
  • An estimated 30,000 to 92,670 illicit votes were trafficked in Georgia, as part of a massive ballot trafficking operation discovered by True the Vote. The group identified 242 traffickers in Georgia who engaged in 5,662 ballot drops into drop boxes, making an average of runs per trafficker. Over 40 percent of the illicit drops that were captured on camera were recorded between the non-voting hours of midnight and 5 a.m.
  • There were over 364,000 ineligible voter registrations on the rolls during the 2020 Election and likely 67,284 votes were cast from voters with invalid residency.
  • Massive manipulation of the Georgia voter rolls surrounding the 2020 Election has been uncovered. This includes 1,500 Voter IDs that received credit for voting in 2020, but were not on any voter rolls from 2020, some appearing for the first time on the voter rolls on Nov. 4, 2021, a year after the Election. Other findings include manipulation of inactive voters to cast ballots, “gifting” Nov. 3 votes up to 2 years after the Election, and casting votes on ballots previously rejected, cancelled, or not even turned in.
  • In 2020, there were absentee ballots issued to “Bangkok Thailand, Ga.,” “Denver, Ga.,” “Detroit, Ga.,” “Los Angeles, Ga.,” and other fraudulent addresses that do not exist. Ballots were fraudulently cast in 2020 from addresses listed as “Bronx, Ga.,” “Hilton Head, Ga.,” “Louisville, Ga.,” “San Diego, Ga.,” “New Orleans, Ga.,” “French Creek, Ga.,” “Virginia Beach, Ga.,” “Vicksburg, Ga.,” “Baltimore, Ga.,” “New York, Ga.,” and “Sarasota, Ga.,” all with zip codes out of state.
  • 43,907 drop box ballots violated chain of custody requirements in DeKalb County.
  • 59,000 of the 79,460 drop box ballots in Fulton County were not immediately transported to the election registrar, in violation of State Election Board rules.
  • An estimated 355,000 ballot transfer forms for drop box ballots are missing statewide.
  • Over 100,000 tally sheets for Fulton County were missing from the hand count audit, and remained missing for months after the Election.
  • In early January 2021, Ruby Freeman asked for an attorney because she wanted to “go live on every platform” to divulge information about how “the USB ports” were used in the 2020 Election. The expert cyber report by Professor J. Alex Halderman explained how external USB ports with election-changing malware can be inserted into Dominion machines by anyone with access, including election workers.
  • The presence of a “QR code mismatch” error within the Dominion tabulators that systematically undercounts votes was found in 65 out of 67 Georgia counties where records were available. The error was present in system log files for tabulators used in elections in 2020, 2021, and 2022.
  • The election results in Georgia in 2020 are not only unreliable, but were electronically altered, and are unsupported by the state’s own election records. The appearance of tens of thousands of unconfirmed ballots in subsequent hand and machine counts suggest reconciliation happened after the Election, meaning after it was clear what margins were needed to win.
  • Fulton County election officials admitted in early 2021 they do not engage in any reconciliation until weeks after Election Day. This means the number of voters showing up at the polls during each day of voting is not checked with the number of ballots tabulated each day, a basic process to ensure the number of ballots and voters match, and cannot be manipulated later.
  • “We can’t start reconciling that until usually a couple days before certification,” said then-Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron, during a January 2021 Board meeting. “Because we have to get that report from KnowInk. I think KnowInk sends those to the state or KnowInk sends those directly to us. But those aren’t compiled then, on Election night. So we don’t have any way to balance those then. That’s like the post-election process that we do.”


  • Wisconsin was called by 20,682 votes.
  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law, in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022.
  • Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though “WEC’s commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.”
  • Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use “creative solutions” to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be “unstaffed.” There were 528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person.
  • In a concurring opinion to the ruling finding drop boxes to be unlawful, Justice Rebecca Bradley writes, “If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all, elections must be conducted according to law. Throughout history, tyrants have claimed electoral victory via elections conducted in violation of governing law… in Wisconsin elected officials “deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
  • “The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.”
  • Justice Bradley concluded “thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful method,” using drop boxes, “thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters.”
  • “The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people’s faith that the election produced an outcome reflective of their will,” Justice Bradley writes. “The Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the results in question…Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government. Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in turn pollutes the integrity of the results.”
  • In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling 217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials claiming the drop boxes would be “under 24-hour surveillance.” However, after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requests. Various responses included, “No records exist for your request,” “No video from requested time frame,” “No such records exist,” and “No security camera.”
  • The election integrity group True the Vote identified 107 ballot traffickers in Milwaukee County between Oct. 20 and Nov. 3, 2020, who each made 20 or more visits to drop boxes. Each trafficker made an average 26 visits, and as many as 15 in one day, and made multiple visits to non-governmental organizations.
  • The 107 traffickers made a total of 2,824 trips to drop boxes during the 2020 Election, with a majority of visits occurring after 8:00 p.m.
  • In 2020 there was a surge of “indefinitely confined” votes in Wisconsin, resulting in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter ID. This surge of suspect votes was due to Democrat election clerks giving advice that was deemed illegal after the election, instructing voters to identify themselves as disabled during the COVID pandemic to avoid voter ID laws.
  • Indefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overall.
  • There were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016, and roughly 70,000 43 in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified 48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682.
  • Scott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the Voter ID law.
  • McDonell previously blamed Wisconsin’s voter ID law for President Trump’s victory in 2016, claiming in a 2018 Twitter post that “thousands of voters [were] deterred from voting due to [the] ID law.”
  • In 2020, McDonell urged all voters to declare themselves indefinitely confined in order to obtain an absentee ballot and “skip the step of uploading an ID” in the April 2020 primary election. Once a voter is identified as indefinitely confined, they continue to receive absentee ballots automatically for subsequent elections. “I urge all voters who request a ballot and have trouble presenting a valid ID to indicate that they are indefinitely confined,” McDonell said in a Facebook post.
  • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December 2020 that the pandemic “did not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot,” and the clerks’ “interpretation of Wisconsin election laws was erroneous.”
  • The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law by not allowing Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) inside their facilities, which led to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had votes cast in their name with the assistance of nursing home staff.
  • An investigation by the Racine County Sheriff found the Wisconsin Elections Commission “shattered” state election laws. Nursing homes saw an “unusual surge in voting activity,” and at least 8 cases of felony voter fraud were found in one nursing home, accounting for nearly 1 in 5 families of residents.
  • The Wisconsin Election Commission admitted it was “essentially telling the clerks to break the law” by ordering the sending of absentee ballots to nursing homes and barring Special Voting Deputies inside the facilities.
  • An interim report released by Special Counsel Michael J. Gableman raised “serious and legitimate questions that the certification of Wisconsin’s election results may have been undertaken in an unlawful and unconstitutional manner.”
  • Gableman claimed “Democracy in the Park” events in Madison involved numerous possible violations of the law, “calling into question the validity of over 17,000 absentee ballots.”
  • These outdoor events to collect mail-in ballots were the subject of numerous complaints, and it is “not clear that all of the workers at those events were properly deputized and trained, swore and filed the mandatory oath of office, or documents related to absentee ballots were properly handled.”
  • The Office of the Special Counsel also claimed evidence of “undue influence by well-funded private groups, who leveraged large grants to certain Wisconsin cities in order to co-opt our election apparatus to their benefit.”
  • The report confirms at least 17.5 percent of election clerks “were not properly trained,” and that “exploitation of elders” occurred in nursing homes.
  • In one example, Maryl Barrett, who was 104 years old and did not recognize her own children, had a ballot cast in her name in the 2020 Presidential Election.
  • The Office of Special Counsel’s second interim report found nursing homes in Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine counties with 100 percent turnout due to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s order.
  • The special counsel said it possessed evidence of nursing home facility staff and directors who “assisted residents in completing ballots; assisted residents in obtaining absentee ballots; pressured residents to vote; collected completed ballots from residents; forged signatures of residents; illegally returned residents’ ballots to the municipal clerks by mail, by placing the ballots in drop boxes, and/ or delivering them directly to the clerks; pressured and/or assisted incompetent persons to complete and cast ballots in the November 2020 election, up to and including persons who have had their right to vote take away by court order due to mental incompetence.”
  • The second interim report also detailed an $8.8 million “election bribery scheme” involving Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life and the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay. “In the agreement, the Cities took CTCL’s money to facilitate in-person and absentee voting within their respective city.”
  • The “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan” developed for CTCL facilitated grants to major Wisconsin cities to deploy drop boxes for mail-in ballots, including $50,000 to Green Bay, $40,000 to Kenosha, $50,000 to Madison, $58,500 to Milwaukee, and $18,000 to Racine.
  • Whitney May, the director of government services for CTCL, posted numerous anti-Trump posts on social media, including telling people “don’t vote for Trump” in 2016.
  • Internal emails from election officials in Green Bay revealed Michael Spitzer Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election.”
  • The Office of the Special Counsel referenced this case, and has evidence that this grantee, which was funded by CTCL, was “directly involved in all aspects of management of election officials, was entrusted with the only sets of physical keys to the city’s central count location, managed the transportation of ballots, and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central count location beyond the lawful time window.”


  • Pennsylvania was called by 80,555 votes.
  • Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an election with this type of discrepancy.
  • Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the margin in Pennsylvania. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers said.
  • The Pennsylvania Department of State’s office called this “obvious misinformation,” while admitting the “only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories,” which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still not completed — an admission the election was certified without ensuring the number of voters and votes matched in the SURE system. The election was certified on Nov. 24, 2020, and the Department of State’s statement came on Dec. 29, 2020.
  • The SURE system was checked and downloaded weekly with updated voter histories from the general Election until all the counties uploaded their vote histories, which was not completed until February 2021. At this time there were still over 121,000 votes that did not have a corresponding voter in the SURE system.
  • The statement by the Department of State “that the voting would reconcile, once the counties completed their SURE uploads, was incorrect,” according to Verity Vote. “When the final county finished uploading their voter histories and closed the election in SURE, it was February 1, 2021, which was the same day that [Secretary of State Kathy] Boockvar announced her resignation. At the time that Philadelphia closed the election in SURE, the voter histories showed that the county accepted at least 7,944 ballots that could not be associated with a registered voter.”
  • Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots after Election Day, and these individuals were included in the voter history files. This includes 50,285 received between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6; 11,570 received between Nov. 7 and Nov. 11; and 10,038 that were received on or after Nov. 12. Boockvar claimed only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of the polls on Election Day and Nov. 6.
  • While 71,893 people received credit for voting by mail, these votes purportedly did not count. Even while including these voters in the total number of who participated in the Election, Pennsylvania still came up 121,240 voters short.
  • According to the Department of State data, there were 7,035,746 ballots cast in the 2020 Presidential Election, including all write-in votes, over-votes, and under-votes. “After all counties closed the election in SURE, only 6,914,556 voters were credited with participation in the 2020 General Election. This reveals a voter deficit of 121,240.”
  • In Philadelphia, hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place.
  • U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain was told to stand down and not investigate election irregularities by Attorney General Bill Barr. McSwain said he was instructed to not discuss the allegations of voter fraud he received, and to pass any “serious” investigations along to then-State Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who promised days before the election that President Trump “is going to lose.”
  • Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $25 million into the administration of the election in Pennsylvania in 2020. Over $10 million went to the Democrat-controlled jurisdiction of Philadelphia, which included $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” and $552,000 for drop boxes.
  • A lawsuit filed in Delaware County revealed video evidence of election officials discussing destroying election evidence from the November 2020 Election. “It’s a felony,” one official says after talking about the need to “get rid” of voting “pads and second scanners.” Sources involved in the litigation alleged the Delaware County officials violated numerous election laws and that the destruction of records was “done to ensure records eventually provided actually matched the election results that were reported in Nov. 2020.”
  • Delaware County received $2.2 million from Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which it spent on “recruiting and training a sufficient number of poll workers; setting up drop box locations for voters to return ballots,” and other Get Out the Vote efforts.
  • The election integrity group True the Vote said Philadelphia was the worst offender it witnessed when investigating the widespread ballot trafficking scheme operating across multiple Swing States in 2020. They identified 1,155 ballot traffickers who each visited at least 10 drop boxes and five non-governmental organizations. Some ballot traffickers made hundreds of trips to drop boxes.


  • Arizona was called by a margin of 10,457 votes.
  • Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up from the U.S. Postal Service. By law, ballots must be received no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3.
  • “The 20,000 ballots recorded as incoming from the USPS on and after November 4 were of sufficient quantity to change the result of the 2020 General Election in Arizona,” according to Verity Vote.
  • The findings were based on Maricopa County’s official Elections Department records, which were withheld from a public records request for nearly seven months. The records showed 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4; 1,000 received on Nov. 5; and 1,500 received on Nov. 6.
  • The 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4 and subsequently counted represented a significant spike in ballots received, higher than every single day total since Oct. 29, 2020. The receipt of mail-in ballots had steadily declined from 14,500 ballots on Oct. 29 to 10,500 on Oct. 30; 6,000 on Oct. 31; 1,500 on Nov. 1; 1,000 on Nov. 2; and 2,500 on Nov. 3.
  • In the 2020 General Election, 420,987 ballots failed signature verification standards, “thus the election was openly vulnerable to fraud,” according to an ongoing analysis conducted by We the People Arizona Alliance and presented to the state legislature.
  • The initial analysis of 380,976 ballots, using official state records and official signature verification training techniques, identified 181,378 ballots that should not have been counted, or nearly half of all reviewed.
  • This includes: 1,870 blank envelopes, some of which were approved on Nov. 5 and Nov. 8; 542 with a signature other than the voter; 2,104 scribbles; 128 duplicate voters processed; 48,117 unreasonably different control signatures; 1,875 where the signature did not match until after the election; 36,034 control signatures that do not match the voter; 4,433 unusable control signatures; 47,366 that failed Secretary of State standards; and 38,909 egregious signature mismatches, where not one point of a signature matched any on file.
  • In the case of the 1,875 votes, the ballot envelopes did not have a signature match on Election Day, but “matching” signatures were later put on file for the voter on either Jan. 28, 2021, Feb. 3, 2021, or Feb. 8, 2021. There were 783 signatures digitally inserted on Feb. 3, 2021 alone.
  • Since the findings were presented to the Arizona State Legislature, the number of egregious mismatches found has increased to 76,354, over seven times the election margin. This is an error rate of 9.30 percent of ballot envelopes reviewed.
  • Throughout the signature verification analysis, which remains ongoing, analysts have consistently found 20 percent do not meet the Secretary of State’s standards, and 9 percent are egregious violations. Extrapolated to all 1.9 million mail-in ballots in 2020, 176,700 ballots “should have been rejected for improper signature verification due to egregious signature mismatches.”
  • Maricopa County has no documented chain of custody for 740,000 ballots from the 2020 Election.
  • Out of the 923,000 early vote ballots accepted at vote centers or drop boxes, only 183,406 ballots are accounted for on ballot transport forms. More than 80 percent of the ballot transport forms have no ballot counts.
  • Without proper documentation of how many votes were cast at the time they were cast, it is impossible to verify the origin and true total of ballots in a given election. “Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots,” according to Verity Vote. “Keeping a proper chain of custody is more than a best practice – it is essential to encouraging trust in our democracy,” according to the Election Assistance Commission.
  • Of the 1,895 early vote ballot transport forms, 48 did not have the required two witness signatures attesting to the ballot transfer, including some with no witness signatures at all. “As a result, the public is not assured that both parties witnessed the transfer of ballots,” as required.
  • Millions of files of 2020 General Election data and security logs were deleted from the Elections Management Server and purged on critical days, including the day before the Arizona audit of the 2020 Election began on Feb. 2, 2021.
  • The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors admitted they purged the system and moved election data after they received a subpoena, in testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives.
  • Two precincts in Pima County had over 100 percent turnout for mail-in ballots, and 40 precincts had over 97 percent returned.
  • The national mail-in ballot return rate was 71 percent, but in Pima County the mail-in ballot return rate was 15 percent higher, and 19 percent higher than all the counties combined in the entire state of Arizona. One precinct with 99.5 percent mail-in turnout had 9,812 ballots counted. Another precinct with 100.6 percent turnout had 2,182 ballots returned, but only 2,170 mail-ins were ever sent. These two precincts total 11,994 ballots, which alone is more than the margin needed to alter the outcome of the Presidential Election.
  • In all, there were 264,000 votes from precincts in Pima County with over 92 percent turnout for mail-in ballots.
  • Significant anomalies were discovered for mail-in ballot returns in Pima County. In precincts with anomalous high turnout of over 92 percent in Pima County, mail-in ballots started flipping from 6 percent Republican for Biden to 40 percent of Republicans voting for Biden.
  • The election integrity group True the Vote identified more than 202 ballot traffickers in Maricopa County who made 4,282 individual drop box visits during the 2020 General Election.
  • Two individuals were charged and plead guilty for ballot harvesting in Yuma County, Arizona during the 2020 primary election.
  • A computer scientist testified that an algorithm similar to what is used in cruise control or self-driving cars was present affecting the early votes in Pima and Maricopa counties in the 2020 General Election, with the ability to “reach and maintain a predetermined setpoint (outcome) despite unplanned disturbances.”
  • Walter C. Daugherity, a senior lecturer emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University who developed courses in artificial intelligence, expert systems, programming and software design, analyzed the Cast Vote Records, finding, “ballots in Maricopa County and Pima County were artificially processed through the tabulators tracking a ProportionalIntegral-Derivative (PID) type control function in a closed-loop feedback system.”
  • Daugherity, who has received over $2.8 million in grant funding and was previously consulted as a computer expert by the New York Times, Washington Post, IBM Federal Systems Division, the Texas Department of Agriculture, U.S. Customs Service, as well as classified work, discovered “significant and systematic decline in the cumulative ratio as counting progresses,” in the early mail-in and in-person votes for the Presidential Election results in Maricopa County and Pima County.
  • For example, the “first block of ballots being 75 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 74 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 73 [percent] for a candidate, and so on, systematically declining all the way to Election Day.”
  • Daugherity’s expert opinion is that the downward sloping line in the sequence that votes were recorded indicated a strong control. The cumulative ratio of Biden to Trump votes for all cast vote records before Election Day in recorded order for Pima County declines from over 300 percent to 157 percent by Election Day.
  • “Such a uniform and predictable pattern is so statistically implausible that it would not occur without artificial manipulation,” according to Daugherity. The data’s lack of independence cannot be explained by the preference of Democrats voting earlier than Republicans.


  • Michigan was called by 154,188 votes.
  • A record 5,579,317 votes were cast and certified in Michigan in the 2020 General Election, the highest turnout in 60 years. To date, Michigan has never shown 5,579,317 voters listed for the 2020 Election in its Qualified Voter File, the state’s database for all voter registration records.
  • As of December 2023, Michigan has 271,566 more votes than the number of voters listed in its Qualified Voter File for Nov. 3, 2020, more than one and a half times the Election margin.
  • In data obtained from the Secretary of State’s office on nearly a monthly basis since the Election, the most voters ever recorded in the Qualified Voter File was 5,511,303 voters in April 2021. This means Michigan’s own election records showed 68,014 more votes than voters. However, the number of voters listed in the Qualified Voter File has been in flux ever since December 2020, and always short of the voters needed to reconcile the total votes cast. A complete list of voters from 2020 has never been provided.
  • The number of voter IDs listed as voting in 2020 has steadily declined since February 2022. As of December 2023, there was a total of 5,307,751 voters listed as voting on Nov. 3, 2020 in the Qualified Voter File. Voter history files continue to be removed from the record, resulting in 271,566 less vote history records than necessary to reconcile the results.
  • Each month voter histories from the 2020 Election are being manipulated. Thousands of unique votes are removed from the voter history files, and other unique votes added. Since December 2020, 270,559 voter histories for 2020 have been removed, while 103,128 have been added.
  • Individual voter histories are constantly changing, including the history of the state’s Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose voting history is missing votes throughout 2020.
  • A complete list of voters was requested via a Freedom of Information Act request in December 2021 and took nine months for the state to fulfill. Two datasets were provided, and neither matched. The first dataset fell 22,146 voters short, while the second dataset was 120,883 absentee ballots short.
  • Democrats threatened Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers and doxxed children in order to certify the 2020 results. Monica Palmer, then the chair of the Wayne County Board of Supervisors, cited the fact that 70 percent of Detroit’s mail-in ballot counts were still “out of balance and unexplained” from the August primary as a reason why she initially voted against certifying the 2020 Election results. Palmer was “bullied and threatened” and “feared for her safety” due to threats she received for voting no. A Democrat Michigan State representative-elect attacked Palmer over her certification vote, and revealed where her children went to school, saying, “I want you to think about what that means for your kids.”
  • Officials in Detroit illegally blocked Republican poll challengers’ access, covered the windows, called the cops, and denied lawful challenges in order to count ballots in secret.
  • Affidavits and video evidence revealed thousands of ballots were delivered through a back door of the TCF center, the central counting facility in Detroit, at 3:30 a.m. on Election night.
  • A report seeking to “debunk” issues of fraud released by the Michigan State Senate Oversight Committee confirmed a “large volume” of ballots were delivered to the TCF center with no chain of custody in the middle of the night.
  • An estimated 289,866 absentee ballots were identified as sent to people who never requested them, “something that would be illegal,” according to the senate committee.
  • Mark Zuckerberg gave Michigan $16.8 million through his nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life.
  • Detroit received $7.4 million to “dramatically” expand the vote for Democrats. The grants financed drop boxes “to facilitate the return of absentee ballots,” like the ones that came in the TCF center after midnight.
  • The election integrity group True the Vote uncovered the same pattern of widespread ballot trafficking between NGOs and ballot drop boxes in Michigan. Numerous instances of ballot stuffing were caught on camera in Detroit, including video where a woman can be seen going to a drop box, and abruptly returning to her car after realizing the stack had no signatures. The woman then signs the ballots, and deposits the illicit ballots she had just signed into the drop box.
  • Secretary Jocelyn Benson made unlawful changes to signature verification rules for absentee ballots, ordering election workers to presume all were legitimate. A judge ruled Benson’s order was invalid, but not until months following the election, and just 0.1 percent of mail-in ballots were rejected in the November 2020 Election for all signature issues. The rejection rate for mismatching signatures was just 0.04 percent, as only 1,400 out of 3.4 million ballots were rejected.
  • Secretary Benson has lost in court six times for issues related to the 2020 Election.
  • A fraudulent voter registration scheme was discovered in October 2020 and documented in a police report in Muskegon County and hidden for nearly 3 years after the 2020 Election.
  • A city clerk in Muskegon witnessed a woman drop off between 8,000 and 10,000 voter registrations at the clerk office on Oct. 8, 2020, many appearing to be fraudulent. The incident was reported it to the Muskegon Police Department one week later. Eight thousand new voter registrations in Muskegon would amount to over 20 percent of the city’s population of only 38,000 residents.
  • An ensuing investigation confirmed thousands of voter registrations in the same handwriting and many invalid or non-existent addresses. The suspect told Michigan State Police that she was being paid $1,150 per week to “find unregistered voters and provide them with a form so they can get registered to vote or obtain their absentee ballot.” The police found “dozens of new phones” and “hundreds of pre-paid payment cards” during the investigation.
  • A Department of State analyst consulted in the investigation confirmed a quantity of voter applications were “clearly fraudulent” and others were “highly suspicious having either erroneous or are missing key pieces of information.” Others appeared to be legitimate.
  • The organization behind the scheme was GBI Strategies, a firm hired by numerous Democrat campaigns. GBI Strategies was funded by a super PAC called “Black PAC,” which paid the firm $11,254,919 to register voters for Joe Biden in 2020. Employees of GBI Strategies were paid $15 an hour or $120 a day, according to the police report.
  • GBI Strategies was believed to be operating not just in Muskegon, but throughout Michigan and in other Swing States.
  • Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office contacted the Muskegon Police Department and asked Michigan State Police to assist with a joint investigation. The Michigan police then turned their investigation over to the FBI.
  • Andrew Kloster, deputy general counsel at the United States Office of Personnel Management during the Trump Administration, said he was made aware of the investigation into GBI Strategies before the 2020 Election and attempted to raise the issue for further investigation. He was informed there were “standing orders not to deal with election matters” in the offices of the White House counsel office and Attorney General Bill Barr.
  • The investigation was not made public until 2023, after the police reports were obtained through a Michigan Freedom of Information Act request.

I look forward to fact-checkers debunking this, citing sources from the corporate media that spent four years claiming Donald Trump was a Russian agent and dismissing Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian disinformation.

I encourage you to personally review the numerous citations in this report and reach your own conclusions.

Whistleblower Steps Forward – Reveals Private Facebook Group Where MI Clerks Discuss Evidence of Organized Fraud in 2020 Election

Three weeks ago, the MI GOP Director of Election Integrity, Phil O’Halloran, gave Patty McMurray and Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit a stunning MI State Police report that was FOIA’d by a Muskegon resident who questioned the outcome of his race in the 2020 election. The report is based on an investigation that was initiated on October 8, 2020, that was eventually taken over by the FBI in 2022.

After publishing the report that exposed a massive cover-up by Michigan’s Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel and Democrat Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson of an explosive, statewide investigation by the MI State Police, Muskegon, MI Police Department, we began to receive tips from individuals who read our story and wanted to help us close the gaps in the highly redacted MI State Police report.

The whistleblower who contacted us explained that they do not want to be identified over fears of retribution by elected officials in Michigan. They confirmed for us that the details of the police report were accurate but explained there was much more to this story than ONE city clerk receiving boxes of suspicious voter registrations; in fact, clerks across the state of Michigan received boxes and priority mail envelopes stuffed with registrations, many of them with the same signatures, the same last four numbers of their social security number, fake names and fake addresses.

For three years, Michigan residents were told by their Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson that they had nothing to worry about, that Michigan’s 2020 election was “the most secure election” in history.

MI Dem SOS Jocelyn Benson and MI Dem AG Dana Nessel

AG Nessel and SOS Benson admonished anyone who suggested any sort of widespread voter fraud took place in the state of Michigan or in other swing states where every vote mattered to a party hell-bent on pushing a confused old man campaigning from his basement over the finish line. They told the people who believed they were telling the truth that there was no widespread fraud in Michigan— to ignore any evidence they saw or any stories they read about left-wing judges throwing election fraud cases out of court because they were all part of a “big lie” concocted by Donald Trump and his followers to make Joe Biden look like an illegitimate president.

All along, we were being lied to, and now, we have proof they were lying…

In the 2020 election, one Michigan clerk, who is now retired, posted an image of what her fellow clerks called a “care package” from a left-wing campaign and organizing group that occasionally went by the name GBI Strategies and other times went by the name “Empower Michigan.”

Clerks reported receiving what they called “care packages” from GBI Strategies, with whom several were on a first-name basis. They also referenced “EM” interchangeably with GBI. “EM” is short for “Empower Michigan,” which was a Democrat group working alongside GBI, which appears to share the same address as the Michigan Democrat Party.

Here is Clerk #1’s original post to her fellow clerks on October 5, 2020:

Here is what the clerk posted alongside this post.

Another current Michigan clerk chimed in to say that she had received similar likely fraudulent voter registration applications from the same address as GBI was using. Her fellow clerk, Muskegon City Clerk Ann Meisch, knew the answer in the post’s comments because Meisch was on a first-name basis with GBI Strategies/Empower Michigan. Meisch was the clerk who notified police after receiving over 10,000 suspicious and fraudulent voter registrations sent to her Muskegon office from GBI Strategies.


Another current Michigan clerk chimed in to say that she had received similar likely fraudulent voter registration applications from the same address as GBI was using. Her fellow clerk, Muskegon City Clerk Ann Meisch, knew the answer in the post’s comments because Meisch was on a first-name basis with GBI Strategies/Empower Michigan. Meisch was the clerk who notified police after receiving over 10,000 suspicious and fraudulent voter registrations sent to her Muskegon office from GBI Strategies.

The same box, with the same PPE materials within, was being sent to clerks all over Michigan. Is it possible Muskegon’s Ann Meisch reported it because it was so outlandishly out of proportion to the City of Muskegon voter file? The MI State Police report and Muskegon Police report provide no evidence that any of these other clerks reported the GBI Strategies fraud to law enforcement.

And Meisch was right; the return address did come from a hotel in Auburn Hills that appeared to be part of the GBI/Empower Michigan, AKA “EM” operation where boxes of voter registrations were being sent to clerks across the state.

Here is the post by City of Muskegon Clerk Ann Meisch on October 5, 2020, including a photo of the package she received along with photos showing the signatures on registrations that appear to all be in the same handwriting inside of the box. Meisch shared that the ‘care package’ she received was from an address of the Staybridge Motel in Auburn Hills, MI, and the name on the return address was “EM.”

Another former clerk responded in the comments among clerks three years ago, this is what she had to say in private among her fellow clerks:


We have contacted this clerk for comment, and she has not responded.

Earlier this week, the Gateway Pundit reported on the suspicious spikes in registrations that happened across Michigan on October 9th. This ‘care package’ from August 3rd was apparently in addition to the massive dump of 10,000-12,000 fraudulent voter registration applications sent to Muskegon in October.

Previously, Meisch had told law enforcement that the GBI applications came in October 2020 in several batches. Meisch said that she was ‘in shock’ at this big batch of registrations.

Westland City Clerk Richard LeBlanc shared a comment under Ann Meisch’s post about receiving the box of what appeared to be fraudulent AV registration forms labeled “PPE.”

“Yes. We received five (5) large bundles.” he wrote. We have chosen not to cover Richard LeBlanc’s name on this post because he is a former MI State Representative and should know better than to report to fellow clerks what appears to be a widespread voter registration fraud scheme instead of to law enforcement. While it is possible that Clerk LeBlanc reported his findings to law enforcement, he makes no mention of contacting the police to his fellow clerks, and we can find no evidence of these boxes of registrations being investigated in other cities.

Richard LeBlanc was a Democrat member of the House of Representatives in Michigan. He was elected in 2006 to represent Michigan’s 18th State House District, located in Wayne County.

We called Clerk LeBlanc to get a statement from him and to ask if he ever reported the “5 large bundles” of voter registrations to law enforcement, but we were told he is out of the office and won’t be returning until next week. We will follow up with Clerk LeBlanc next week.

In the comments on this post, Clerk #10 notes that she received a package from GBI Strategies the same day as does Clerk #11; even her fellow Clerk #12 was trying to warn Meisch that these looked fraudulent:

The comments revealed other Clerks who were also receiving illegal applications to vote, and other Clerks advising caution about these suspicious applications.

MI Clerk #16 received a voter registration application missing the required information in order to legally register. She asked her fellow clerks for advice on what to do.

Here is her post:

Clerk #18 asks what she should do in this situation.

Clerk #19 relates that they were advised to send it to the Secretary of State’s office instead of rejecting it.

You can note that Clerk #19 knows that this isn’t proper procedure because he refers to the Secretary of State as the “Secretary of Silliness” and notes both that there was a “wink wink” nature to sending imperfect ballots to far-left Secretary Benson and that they sent a copy to his State Representative out of caution.

These Clerks weren’t following the law or proper procedure for these registration applications; they were following what they felt was the unofficial demands of the Lansing power structure: send us flawed voter registrations so that they can be extra-legally fixed and cured of their defects.

Dana Nessel has been previously begrudgingly shamed into prosecuting election fraud when committed by Democrats. She prosecuted Southfield City Clerk Sherikia Hawkins, who was caught changing 193 ballots in the 2018 election.

Hawkins was charged with six felonies; a judge removed 5 of the 6 charges shortly before she ran for re-election. The charges were added back after the Democrat city clerk won re-election. Finally, years after being caught committing multiple counts of voter fraud, Sherikia Hawkins stood trial. Sharikia Hawkins was sentenced to ONE DAY In jail and issued a fine.

When the story first broke about the voter fraud committed by the Demcorat city clerk, SOS Jocelyn Benson, and AG Dana Nessel promised they would seek justice in the case. Justice appears to be a flexible term for the Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel.


Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona

This article was originally published on at this link.

Predetermined algorithms caused widespread election fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona. Jovan Hutton Pulitzer told a packed room on June 27 that he conducted a forensic kinematic investigation of the ballots that “shows sufficient and irrefutable evidence of pervasive voter fraud and widespread election fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona.” Pulitzer explained that “specific ballots” were repeatedly and fraudulently inserted to predetermine the election’s winner. In short, the Maricopa election was an absolute mess that robbed many voters of their 14th amendment rights. Pulitzer said he is still knee-deep in the investigation.

To be clear, a kinematic investigation means Pulitzer actually followed the physical and cyber “trail” of the Maricopa County ballots from the time they were manufactured to the “printing, the folding, sorting, and mailing” of those ballots. Pulitzer then “followed the mailing process, the return process, the election handling process, and eventual scanning, tallying, and election recording of the votes—and reporting of the final outcome.” In addition, Pulitzer drilled his investigation down to the precinct level. He and his team processed over 20,895,610 digital and forensic images in multiple formats.

Predetermined Algorithms and Strategically Inserted Ballots

Pulitzer says he can prove that predetermined algorithms caused the election to be skewed toward a win for Biden.

“91.62 percent of the predetermined ballots were cast in favor of Joe Biden.”

Approximately 406,972 of the over 2.1 million ballots cast in Maricopa County were “of a predetermined origin” because of the use of algorithms. 38 percent of the mail-in ballots for Biden were found to be of a predetermined nature. 33 percent of the Trump ballots on election day were predetermined. After removing the fraudulently cast ballots, Trump got 59% of the votes. To find that “true vote,” Pulitzer removed the ballots contributing to the predetermined outcome. Biden only got 41 percent with the removal of the predetermined ballots.

Pulitzer is confident that when the algorithm could not keep pace with the votes coming in for Trump, “paper ballots had to be created to match the electronic outcome.” He found ample evidence of many ballot boxes that were “pilfered.” The boxes were “opened and reopened over time to either insert or remove ballots.”

Interestingly, 52 ballot boxes were “pre-set aside” on Election Day for a hand audit. Oddly, those boxes were the only ones that were never disturbed. The inconsistencies and non-compliance concerning the handling of the other ballot boxes were remarkable, allowing for fraudulent activity such as the insertion of ballots where needed.

Pallet upon pallet of boxes was dual-dated. That translates to ballots with multiple dates and multiple months all mixed in, a finding that is “not congruent with how these ballots should be processed.” 89 percent of the dual date batches “were decided for Joe Biden,” according to Pulitzer. He stated that election workers “with decades of experience had never seen such dual date batches.” Pulitzer believes the boxes were “pilfered to make the paper match the digital outcome.”

Incorrect Paper Causes Compromised Elections

The incorrect paper was also used; paper that was so thin it allowed for bleed-through on the ballots, which, in turn, caused massive forced adjudication of ballots. To run an honest election, the paper must be the correct printing density, and the printing machines must be properly maintained and calibrated. Pulitzer said, “343,304 ballots were printed out of mechanical compliance,” with no one supervising or inspecting the printers.

That is 343,304 voters who “were not treated equally” in the election, according to the 14th amendment. His analysis included bleedthrough analysis, chromatic analysis, human or machine voted Oval analysis, and machine or hand fold or no fold analysis. The use of incorrect paper and poorly calibrated machines resulted in 120,867 compromised ballots. That represents 6 percent of the votes and creates “a forced adjudication event.” That is “nine times the deciding outcome of the 2020 election,” added Pulitzer.

The Maricopa County Board of election reported they used only Roland vote secure paper in the 2020 election. However, Pulitzer says this is “patently false.” He backed up his claims with countless official witnesses and affidavits “submitted by longtime Maricopa County election workers.”

“Our systems detected numerous, not secure, non-compliant, simple commercial grade paper cut to the ballot size was used widespread in Maricopa County,” continued Pulitzer, primarily for the needs of the ballot on-demand machines. In excess of 200,000 individual ballots were printed on unauthorized, not official compromised commercially available papers not suitable for compliant ballot-voting stock. 10 percent of the ballots cast in Maricopa County in the Arizona general election were compromised due to the wrong paper ballot stock being utilized.”

SharpieGate is real, despite the protestations of the County election board. Prior to 2020, Sharpie pens were expressly prohibited for obvious reasons—they often bleed through the ballot paper. Using the sharpies with inferior paper is a double whammy. Markings from sharpies cause extra votes and confuse the scanning machines.

Additionally, 10,943 Maricopa general election ballots were straight-up “counterfeit ballots.” The use of these counterfeit ballots “was widespread across all of Maricopa County,” according to Pulitzer. 39 percent of the counterfeit ballots were cast for Donald Trump, and 46 percent were cast for Biden. Thirteen percent were cast for write-in candidates.

“These counterfeit ballots gave Joe Biden an advantage over Donald Trump, equal to almost 7% of the deciding outcome. The malicious use of 10,943 counterfeit ballots represents a subverted or stolen vote from the Arizona voters, which is equal to 104% of the deciding outcome.”

Adjudication Rates were Outlandish

Pulitzer had some remarkable comments on the adjudication rate in the county. Maricopa beat historic records in terms of adjudication rates in 2020. 235,367 ballots were changed “either by a human or a machine” in the election “after the ballots were tallied.” Not only that, he said, “99 percent of all batches were modified.” Remarkably, the ballots were modified electronically “without ANY inspection of the physical ballot paper.” Pulitzer explained:

“Historically across American elections, if more than four ballots per one hundred showed errors in the system, the machines were considered to not be functioning properly. This is one out of every 25 ballots. In the 2016 general election, correcting ballots happened about one per 100 ballots. In 2018 across America, it was two times per 100 ballots, or one out of every 50 ballots. In 2020 Maricopa, AZ, had the adjudication rates jump to an astounding one out of every eight ballots cast. This abnormality in Maricopa represents almost 12 times the historical average per ballot modifications.”

Mail-In Ballots are a Nightmare

One of the most stunning revelations of the evening was related to mail-in ballots. Most people now realize that mail-in ballots were utilized in 2020 on a massive scale under the guise of the pandemic. Ballot cracking was used in the election. Ballot cracking means that individuals can access and tamper with ballots that were returned undeliverable in the mail. The individual opens the ballot, votes, signs a “bogus signature,” or doesn’t sign it. Since Maricopa County fell abysmally short in the area of signature verification, “ballot cracking can go undetected,” said Pulitzer.

Moreover, he stated, when “returned to the county, these ballots simply disappear.” The county reported 53,866 as returned undeliverable ballots in the Maricopa election. However, incredibly:

“The Election Assistance Commission, utilizing United States Postal Service records, reported for 2020 that 110,092 general election ballots were, in fact, returned in Maricopa County, Arizona. Ballot cracking, these mysteriously disappearing 110,092 ballots would have been inserting a number of nefarious ballots in an amount greater than 400% of the official margin of the election.”

The mail-in ballots combined with poorly maintained voter rolls in the county resulted in another opportunity for fraud. There were 246,691 phantom voters on the Maricopa rolls as a result of dirty voter rolls. Nefarious actors can use ballot-cracking and other methods to backfill votes when you have overinflated rolls of 10 percent—as was the case in Maricopa. There was an average of 332 phantom voters per precinct in the county. And “they are almost always wiped from the voter rolls” immediately following an election. “26 percent of the 2020 win were scrubbed immediately following the Maricopa election,” according to Pulitzer.

Coordinated Subversion of an Election

However, the most stunning revelation of the evening referenced how profoundly the 2020 election was allegedly subverted because of the pandemic. Runbeck printed the ballots for many elections, including Maricopa. Pulitzer explained:

“We got no Runbeck records. We got no postal records for some reason for the roughly 2,545,000 voters mailed 4,089,000 ballots. That means Runbeck printed over 4,089,000 ballots. We don’t have an answer for that. That is why ballot cracking is key.”

But here is where the information becomes really interesting. News of the pandemic began to emerge in early 2020. However, Pulitzer points out that the first holiday they told us to all stay home was on the 4th of July. In August, many states decided to go with mail-in ballots. He then refers to something odd that Runbeck did in March and another odd thing the Post Office pulled in April.

“Runbeck placed the largest order in the world ever for ballot envelope stuffing machines on March 1—How did they know? I have the order and everything.

Our United States Post Office has what’s called a mail cover system. This is how when somebody sends anthrax to the president; you’re able to track it. And our Postal Service, when that comes in and goes on the conveyor belt, it snaps the front and back photo and it’s automatic. Those records are kept for six years—for investigational work like we do.

As soon as Runbeck ordered, the machines our United States Post Office stopped its mail cover program—on April 1. It undid it from six years and changed it to 30 days. Let the election run, let Biden get installed, and then turned it back on. We do not have the physical evidence trail. That’s what I was telling you. This is the highest levels of the government. This is how far it goes.”

This article covers a fraction of Pulitzer’s findings. It is well worth the time to watch the entire presentation. Pulitzer implored the citizens attending the event to understand that while the election was shockingly fraudulent, “it is the greatest gift” we could have hoped for. Now that our eyes are open, we can no longer look to others to fix the problem.

“Now that we know every possible way this is done, we can shut it down, he added.“We created this problem because we trust. We don’t operate crookedly. We’re running our lives. We just want to live and be free. But we did this to ourselves. If we let it go, we don’t address it. Nothing is going to stop it. Nobody’s coming to save you except you.” 

Voter Irregularities in Texas (Hart Intercivic)

In order to establish any type of proof of electronic voter fraud, you first have to look at anomalies and irregularities in vote patterns. That means you need to see a repetition of information that appears to skew one way or the other. As Dr. Frank did in his analysis of “electronic vote stuffing” by adding ballots according to a predetermined algorithm and the determining a “key” to predict voter turnout exactly, looking at other patterns that seem to suggest some form of data manipulation in the vote totals. To that aim, a report was produced by Seth Keshel for the Texas Lieutenant Governor’s Task Force on Election Fraud titled, “Report on Suspicious Voting Patterns in Texas.”

Looking at the 2020 Election data, Trump improved over his 2016 performance in 158 counties throughout Texas. Looking at how Mr Trump performed he increased his voter base in traditional Democrat strongholds in the states: Hispanics, suburban White women, Blacks, and blue collar White men. So, the question has to be asked: If Trump gained in traditional Democrat strongholds, where did Biden improve? Republicans? I do not think so, and neither does the data.

So, let’s explore this in a little more detail. If you look at the State of Texas, one of the anomalies that stands out is that in EVERY county that was operating a Hart Intercivic voting system, that Trump lost margins from 2016 compared to 2020. Notice the green X’s in the map below. This is just not a coincidence, it is an impossibility. Remember, Trump IMPROVE his performance across al traditional Democrat demographics, so how did Bide do this? Think phantom voters as I describe here.

Finally, you need to look at the past to understand the present. Below is a table of how Trump performed in the 2016 Presidential Election compared to the 2020 election. In 2016, Trump was running against Hillary Clinton and in almost every county, he beat Clinton by a substantial margin. Remember, there was an election steal going on in 2016 too, but Clinton thought (erroneously) that there was no way Donald Trump could possibly beat her.

Now, lets move to 2020. Looking at the table below, notice that in these counties with HART Intercivic machines, that Trump actually increased his voter turnout substantially, but Biden, the guy who did NO campaigning and did not visit Texas once, actually did BETTER that both the historic highs of both Hillary Clinton (2016, first female candidate) and Barrack Obama (208; first black candidate) in getting more Democrat votes out. Both Clinton and Obama were historic candidates in their own right and of course you would expect to see an increase in Democrat turnout, but for Biden to not only go above, but essentially double these historic candidates turnouts leaves one to pause. This just does not happen unless there is foul play at hand. The big red flag is Tarrant the deep red Tarrant county, flipping18.5 point in Biden’s favor. That just did not happen organically.

Statistically, this is an impossibility considering in counties without HART Intercivic machines, there was no appreciable increase in turnout of Democrats throughout Texas. The increase in Democrat voters in these 12 counties amount to 344,568. Even accounting for historic highs in turnout for these Counties, at least 190,000 votes are just fabricated out of thin air. So, it is pretty easy to see how 1.1 million phantom votes could have been cast in Texas as there 254 counties. The only conclusion one can reach is that these machines’ tabulation was tampered with and must be audited to see if Phantom voting was in play. This audit should also includie canvasing these counties.Until that is done, questions will continue and distrust in our elections will persist. Again, we must eliminate the ability of anyone to manipulate voting totals in Texas en mass, and that means elimination of electronic voting of any kind in Texas.

Dr. Frank Shows Evidence of Phantom Voters in Georgia

Friends, as you might remember, I did an article some 5 months ago about one of the red flags of election fraud: Phantom Voters. Why is this important? Because when you put in phantom ballots, you can easily insert phantom voters. Dr. Douglas Frank is demonstrating evidence of phantom voters in Fayette, Spalding, Coweta, and Clayton Counties in Georgia. To reiterate, Dr. Frank earned a Ph.D. in Surface Electroanalytical Chemistry from the University of Cincinnati and holds patents on custom electronics and software inventions that are used widely as the industrial standards world-wide.

Dr Frank has cracked one of the major hacks of the 2020 elections. The other voter integrity solutions are the canvass, kinematic artifacts (all things paper), and technology (all things software and hardware.). His solution for integrity and transparency in 2022 is to “Vote Amish.” That means no more electronic voting and only using secure paper ballots for voting.

Here is the video of Dr. Frank presenting his findings in Georgia.

This is still more evidence of fraud in Georgia.

Letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the U.S.A ...


Dear Governor Abbott,Despite my big win in Texas, I hear Texans want an election audit! You know your fellow Texans have big questions about the November 2020 Election. Bills to audit elections in your great state’s House and Senate were considered during Texas’ Second Special Session. Instead, the legislature passed a watered-down amendment that doesn’t even apply to the 2020 Presidential Election. This short amendment doesn’t answer the questions Texans have about the last election. Texans demand a real audit to completely address their concerns.

We need HB 16, which was just filed in the Third Special Session. This legislation specifically addresses the 2020 Presidential Election, and enables audits for future elections. The bill creates a process for candidates and party chairs to initiate an audit, and uses the same language as SB 97, which already passed the Texas State Senate, but did not have enough time to make it through the House during the Second Special Session.

Texas needs you to act now. Your Third Special Session is the perfect, and maybe last, opportunity to pass this audit bill. Time is running out. Paper ballots in your state are only kept for 22 months after the election. Your citizens don’t trust the election system, and they want your leadership on this issue, which is the number one thing they care about. It is their most important issue—one that will affect 2022 and 2024.

Governor Abbott, we need a “Forensic Audit of the 2020 Election” added to the call. We’re quickly running out of time and it must be done this week. Texans know voting fraud occurred in some of their counties. Let’s get to the bottom of the 2020 Presidential Election Scam!

Donald J. Trump

Voter Fraud, Nueces Country, Texas

This video by Seth Keshel shows the evidence of how the Democrats where injecting phantom votes and employing vote flipping in Nueces County, Texas. The electronic voting machines injects 8% additional phantom votes (most went to Biden) and flipped 3% of the votes for Trump to Biden. The evidence is derived from historical trends in an urban (Corpus Christi) county and show that Trump moved traditional DEM voters (Hispanics) to his column, and Biden also gained? From where? Oh yeah, the electronic ether. To prove or disprove this claim, you will need to canvas the county and in order to find a lot of votes which were recorded but never actually cast by an individual.

To reiterate, this video shows how in a country, which Trump made historic gains and inroads in traditionally Democrat voters, Hispanics, that Biden also did better than both Obama and Clinton? Impossible. It just goes to show that as long as we have electronic voting in Texas, we WILL have election fraud, period.

Show Me the Evidence – The Most Concise Video on 2020 Voter Fraud

This might be the most comprehensive and concise video on the election fraud that happened in the 2020 Presidential Election. This video was originally made in December of 2020. Highlights include the huge spikes in voter counts in Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia in the middle  of the night when voting was supposed to have stopped, also vote flipping in Florida and other states, weighted voting (which is illegal), eyewitness and video evidence (Fulton County GA ballots under the table), big vote spikes that moved Trump from in the lead to being behind, Dominion unencrypted data transfers from their servers, easily hackable voting machines, high error and adjudication rates (adjudicated votes can be switched), extremely high error rates, missing logs, reprogramming machines in violations of safe harbor voter hacks, unsolicited mail-in ballots, removal of signature validation, and thousands of affidavits of election fraud that has been ignored.

This video might make you angry or discouraged but here is the problem with evidence. It does NOT go away. It just keeps growing and growing and growing. The denier have finally admitted there is voter fraud and yes maybe enough to have effected the election, but too bad there is nothing you can do about it? Really? They should review history because fraud vitiates everything. You should bookmark this video somewhere because it will be useful in dumping Biden in the street.  We have to keep of the fight and get rid of electronic voting wherever possible.

10 Reasons to Question the Election

It’s frustrating to hear people on the Right, including some who should know better, claim there’s “no evidence” of significant, possibly outcome-changing fraud in the last presidential election — even as the forensic audit in Arizona uncovers multiple discrepancies.

Clearly, they’re confusing “evidence” with “proof.”

No, there may not be absolute, incontrovertible proof of election fraud — yet.  But there is plenty of evidence, good reasons a rational person might question the outcome.  Here are ten that come to mind, in no particular order:

Eyewitness testimony.  Since November 3, hundreds of people have come forward to report that they personally witnessed various irregularities in the vote-counting process: ballots run through tabulating machines multiple times; “pristine” mail-in ballots; ballots that appeared to have been printed on different paper or filled out by machines — the list goes on.

Two questions come to mind.  First, what would these witnesses stand to gain by making knowingly false claims?  Many submitted actual affidavits, subjecting themselves to potential legal liability.  Second, could that many people simply be mistaken?  It seems unlikely.

Our own eyes.  Actually, the eyewitness testimony confirms what many of us have since seen for ourselves, via security camera footage: cases of ballots being pulled out from under tables in Fulton County, Georgia, right after observers were told to go home for the night.  Vans pulling up to TCF Center in Detroit, with dozens of boxes unloaded in the dead of night.We also saw, live on television, huge, sudden jumps in vote totals for Biden, in some cases accompanied by corresponding drops in Trump’s totals.

Are there innocent, plausible explanations?  Perhaps.  But I have yet to hear any.  Mostly, we’re just told, “Move along, folks.  Nothing to see here.”

Statistical anomalies.  Some of the most persuasive evidence comes from mathematicians like Edward Solomon, who have conducted in-depth statistical analyses and concluded that the reported election results are highly improbable, if not impossible.  Documented anomalies include repeated percentages that could not occur naturally and number sequences that appear to violate Benford’s Law, governing the standard distribution of first digits.  Both are considered valid indicators of fraud in criminal cases.

Expert testimony.  Along with Solomon, we also have other internationally recognized experts like Jovan Hutton Pulitzer who have put their reputations on the line — in Pulitzer’s case, by devising a method of forensically examining ballots using computer imaging.  These are people who have little to gain from taking an unpopular position.  That they do so openly, for no other reason than that they value the truth, speaks volumes.

Credible proponents.  When pressed to choose between two sides of a controversial issue about which I’m unsure, I typically look at the proponents of the opposing views.  If one side appears more honest, rational, and credible than the other, I tend to lean that way.

Beyond the experts, there are many election skeptics whose opinions I respect.  Some are friends and family members; others are national figures like Garland Favorito; Matthew DePerno; and especially David Clements, on whose Herculean efforts much of this information is based.

Constitutional questions.  For me, one of the biggest issues is whether or not the election was conducted in accordance with the Constitution.  It appears that, in several states, it was not.

The Constitution expressly cedes authority for conducting elections to state legislatures.  But in Pennsylvania, election laws were changed by the Executive Branch and then upheld by the Judiciary, over the objections of the Legislature.  In my home state of Georgia, much of the election process seems to have been shaped by back-room deals between the governor and the “shadow governor,” Stacey Abrams.  I don’t see how either can be constitutional.

Lack of evidentiary hearings.  “But the courts have debunked all these allegations,” the left cries.  Not exactly.  Yes, most (but not all) of the lawsuits brought so far have been dismissed, mostly on technicalities.  Very few courts have actually taken time to hear the evidence.

This brings to mind the old philosophical conundrum about the tree falling in the forest: if you have actual evidence, but the courts refuse to hear it, does it make a sound?

Democrat obstructionism.  Despite all those “wins” in court, and amid absurd claims that this was “the most secure election in history,” Democrats seem oddly reluctant to allow for investigations.  In fact, in Arizona and elsewhere, they appear to be in a state of abject panic, willing to do almost anything to disrupt, discredit, or delay audits.

Why, if there was no fraud, are they so adamant?  Approximately half the country questions the election.  Why not allow the audits to proceed and put those doubts to rest?

Big Tech propaganda.  Whether or not actual fraud occurred, there’s no question Big Tech had its thumb on the scale — promoting false narratives that helped Biden (Russian collusion, the “good people” lie, accusing Trump of downplaying the pandemic) while suppressing factual reports that might have hurt him — in particular, the Hunter Biden laptop story.  Zuckerberg, Dorsey, et al. have essentially admitted as much — and they continue propping up the Biden administration to this day, using the same tactics.

That, folks, is propaganda—and I’m not aware of any situation in history where propaganda was necessary to promote the truth.

The smell test.  Finally, there is this: the whole thing just stinks to high heaven.  A sitting president earns more votes than any sitting president in history; he increases his vote totals among Blacks, Hispanics, and women; he wins 18 of 19 “Bellwether Counties,” along with Florida, Ohio, and Iowa — long the guarantors of presidential victory; his party picks up seats in the House; and he still loses?

That makes no sense.  I might not be able to prove it isn’t true, but I’ll tell you this: I don’t believe it for a minute.

Texas Fraud Debrief with Seth Keshel

Here is a video outlining why there was fraud in Texas by Captain Seth Keshel. Captain Keshel was a Army Intelligence officer that used data to determine how the enemy deploy assets in combat. For the 2020 Presidential Election Mr. Keshel uses statistical analysis to show how phantom votes had to be injected for Biden in order for him to flip counties such as Tarrant and Williamson (historically Republican counties).

Using historical voting and registrations, he asks the question “if Trump huge gained on traditional Democrat strength, working Hispanics, African Americans and suburban women, then were did Biden’s historical increases come from?” Republicans? Nope, phantom votes added by electronic voting machines. There is no way that Biden legal got votes when his base was eroded to significantly in Texas. A true forensic audit will discover this and hopefully lead to the elimination of electronic voting in Texas forever.

Be very clear with the 2020 election: “FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING”


— United States Supreme Court

* “Vitiates” in a legal context means negates, quashes, annuls, invalidates, revokes and abrogates

“Fraud vitiates everything.”  That enduring opinion was the crux of the landmark decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in the above referenced case of the 1878 case of United States versus Throckmorton.

Ipso facto, the outcome of a POTUS election that is rife with one-sided fraud and criminality is rendered null and void.  Especially any result which saw the winner attain his or her victory through fraudulent means and/or criminal conduct is automatically canceled and invalid under the law.

The same U.S. Supreme Court ruling also determined that fraud vitiates contracts. An election is essentially a binding contract between the electorate and the elected. This indispensable social contract is irreparably broken through voter fraud and election cyber-crimes as the public trust is profoundly violated.

The transparent Democrat-directed election theft of 2020 has rent asunder the sacred covenant between the elected and the electors. Hence, Joe Biden’s illicitly declared victory is illegitimate and therefore annulled forthwith.

The Biden-Harris ticket has also forfeited any right to a recount or a re-run of the election because of their highly organized and premeditated fraud perpetrated to outright steal it.  Remember, fraud vitiates everything.

As more details of this unprecedented vote fraud and election theft are brought to light, the Tump-Pence ticket appears to have won by a landslide. The fraudulent Biden wins in the battleground states were actually stolen from Trump, so the result is reversed but by much more than the bogus vote tallies indicate.

President Trump is, therefore, the victor of the 2020 POTUS election by default…by law…and according to the U.S. Constitution. By every indication, his electoral triumph was sealed by the will of a great majority of the American people.

Which means the President now enjoys a HUGE mandate to not only govern in an unobstructed manner, but also to expeditiously implement his urgent MAGA agenda.

— SOTN Resident Legal Counsel

Conclusion & Caveat

This crucial declaration is actually an extremely important notification. It has been released for the benefit of each and every attorney in the USA working on the “Trump v. Biden” case. While most of those state lawsuits focus on the minutiae of Biden’s election theft, it’s critical that the President’s lawyers not lose site of the big picture presented here.

While it is essential to ferret out the facts of the Democrat’s election crime spree across the country to legally prove fraud, at the end of the day, all that matters is that “fraud vitiates everything”. Everything else is a distraction.

In other words, once any or all those intentional frauds have been proven in court, whether by judge or jury, the so-called Biden victory will be vacated for all time. Once the Democrat’s nationwide criminal enterprise has been established via successful lawsuits — even by ONE litigation — Donald Trump ineluctably wins the 2020 POTUS election.

The U.S. Supreme Court has set a loud and clear precedent ruling that “fraud vitiates everything”. The President’s attorneys and all involved law firms need to be acutely aware of this SCOTUS decision that was handed down in the landmark case UNITED STATES v. THROCKMORTON (98 US 61 – Supreme Court 1878); and which emphatically stated that “fraud vitiates everything”.[1]

In light of this vital information, which could very well dictate the final outcome of the 2020 POTUS election, SOTN respectfully requests that this legal analysis be posted and sent out far and wide.  Please disseminate this urgent notification especially throughout the Patriot Movement’s legal community—thank you!

State of the Nation
November 8, 2020



The Cost of Election Fraud

While most people would reply to the question, “What is the cost of election fraud?” with a retort such as: “The lost of our republic,” “No faith in our elected leaders,” and “A move to a global cabal,” I was looking a little bit closer to home, in that what would it have cost to have actually stolen the 2020 Presidential Election in dollars and people. So, that is what I did.

Some time ago (right after the election), I was thinking about how many people would be needed to pull of the election fraud in the 5 large municipalities / counties that we are now all familiar with: Maricopa, AZ, Fulton, GA, Wayne, MI, Philadelphia, PA, and Milwaukee, WI. You know, you always have to follow the money, and someone was hiring people to do these things. I was also perfect because, well, no one was working so, sure some extra cash, no problem.

So shortly after the election was over and we saw these massive ballot drops and vote swings, I started to estimate how many people you would need to pull of this massive fraud. Based on estimates using my background of running manufacturing operations some time ago, I came up with a figure of needing 3,000 individuals and paying out (payouts are multiple levels, because of course you had to pay off the politicians and officials too) of $198 million in my first calculation. I am certain grifters like Stacey Abrams also has a spreadsheet very similar to this one below. I am sure the numbers mind be slightly off, but you get the idea.

In looking at the numbers above you have to think in terms of military organizations. On the top are Generals, Colonels and Majors and those that do the dirty work, Privates, Corporals and Sergeants. In between you have those who manage the grunts: Staff Sergeants, Sergeant Majors; and then those who manage the Sergeants: Lieutenants and Captains. Remember, you just needed 7 locations with this form of command and control to implement a fraud of this magnitude. 400+ individuals is more than enough to have accomplished this per location.

Then we come to find out that Mark Zuckerberg poured in $300 million into these five contested municipalities. So, taking my original calculations, and then doing a little reverse engineering, we come up with new estimates. With $300 million, you can now gainfully employ 4,088 to pull of this massive heist as illustrated below. Not saying that this did happen, but man, it seems really coincidental that all these individuals help make it happen. I remember seeing a video of a mob guy in Philadelphia saying he was paid $3 million to produce 300,000 ballots. The video of Skinny Joey Merlino telling someone that what he did and would testify if offered immunity and a new identity has been taken down, but here is the information link.

See, it is ALWAYS about the money and following it. We have already seen in Georgia how Ms. Abrams, through her company, was able to grift the Georgia governor. Why? Because the both new the previous election for Governor was tainted? Maybe. I am certain if you look at the majority of people pushing back against these audits, they definitely have their hands in the money jar and they are not clean. Just another data point of interest: look for the money. Where did $300 million go, and to whom?

Phantom Votes and Vote Switching – How To Steal An Election

While the 2020 Presidential Election has left a lot to be desired in the sense of transparency and integrity, Dr. Douglas Frank‘s excellent video (follow this link) about adding voters, using the 2020 census, who actually did not vote to the voter rolls (also known as phantom voters see links here and here) does not quite explain in detail how adding these phantom votes would significantly change an election. More precisely, what are the mechanisms used to actually move the vote totals from one candidate to another with “pre-loading” an algorithm into the electronic voting machines.

In this post I will look at only two types of electronic voter manipulations: vote flipping of real votes and adding phantom voters, and the effect each has on vote totals. Flipping votes is usually done with the adjudication process or even pre-programmed into the machines with fractional or weighted voting. In any case, it tends to be a fixed percentage or amount calculated prior to the commencement of voting. While in the 2020 Election it looked like this type of fraud was implemented, it was not quite enough to push one candidate over the line. Remember, fraud comes in many flavors. In addition, in deep red states, vote flipping virtually goes undetected as the outcomes are usually not affected greatly.

The second type of electronic vote manipulation is adding phantom votes, as indicated in Dr. Frank’s video. This is probably the easiest and least detectable of all electronic voter fraud because you already know how many people actually voted before the voting starts. From there you count the real votes from the calculated votes, and then assign the difference to the candidate of your choice. So, if 1,000 where calculated to vote, but only 900 voted, you have 100 phantom votes at your disposal to assigned to a candidate.

In deep red states like Texas, this form of electronic voter fraud has gone pretty much undetected until the last election, when huge swings in Democrat turnout seemed to belie the actual turnout. As stated in an earlier post (Biden’s Campaign and Results defy the Laws of Physics), it is hard to believe that a candidate that did not even visit Texas and whose policies go against most of Texan’s beliefs would have gain so much traction against a populous candidate like Trump. As such, a clarion call must be sound off to investigate the machines and tallies in Texas.

To help understand this there will be three situations that you can see how these two types of vote stuffing and switching can effect an election at the county level. For illustration I will use examples where a county is roughly equal in Democrats (Blue) and Republicans (Red), a county that is slightly more Republican than Democrat, and a county that is heavily Republican.

Now you have to remember that Dr. Frank showed how the 2010 Census was used to stuff phantom votes in each county by age group. For this illustration a fictitious county with 1,000, 60-year-old voters, who typically vote at a 70% (which is high for Texas), will be used for the three different illustrations. Remember, this vote manipulations happened in every age group in every county in Texas that has electronic voting machines.

So, in our first scenario, our Noname County is comprised of roughly 1,000 60-year-olds, and typically 70% (700) vote and about half vote R and half vote D. Using Dr. Frank’s estimation that 6% to 8% of phantom votes were injected into every age group, we selected slightly over 7%, or 50 phantom votes (it makes the math easier to follow) were injected in this scenario. In addition, we kept the actual vote flipping to 1% (7 votes). Now, please stay with me because there is some math going on, but I think you can follow me. So, you would expect that 350 votes would go to the Democrat and 350 will go the Republican is there was a clean and theft free election. Not so.

Look at the illustration below, right away 50 phantom votes are added (see increase from 700 to 750 in left panel), with 48 going to the Democrat candidate and 2 going to the Republican (this is pretty much the rates that actually happened in Georgia and Michigan). At the same time 7 votes were taken away from the Republican and added to the Democrat (center two panels below). As a footnote, vote flipping was shown in real-time on live TV during the 2020 Election night. In the aggregate (the right most panel), the Republican candidate lost 7 votes (dotted red line), but gain 2 votes with the phantom voters for a total of 345 votes (net loss of 5 votes). The Democrat on the other hand added 48 votes (dotted blue line) from the phantom votes and 7 from the vote switching resulting in a 54% to 46% margin of victory. So, yes, in Texas we have a few “swing” counties where this happened.

Now on to a Noname County with the same 1,000 60-year-olds that vote at 70% (700 voters) which leans Red (Republican). We are using the same 7% (50) of phantom voters, but this time we will raise the vote flipping to 2% (14 votes). Again, let’s follow the math. If this were a fair election the Republican would win by a margin of 420 (60%) to 280 (40%) votes. Now with vote switching in the aggregate, the Republican candidate lost 14 votes, but gained 2 votes with the phantom voters for a total of 373 votes (net loss of 12 votes). The Democrat on the other hand added 48 votes from the phantom votes and 14 from the vote switching resulting in a very narrow 50.3% to 49.7% margin of victory. So, yes, in Texas we have a few R counties where a narrow margin was eked out, for example Tarrant County.

Finally, a Noname County with the same 1,000 60-year-olds that vote at 70% (700 voters) which is heavily Republican (60%). We are using the same 7% (50) of phantom voters, but this time we will raise the vote flipping to 3% (3% is what is estimated in 2020 to be pre-programmed into most machines which is 21 votes in this example). Again, let’s follow the math. If this were a fair election the Republican would win by a margin of 420 (60%) to 280 (40%) votes. Now with vote switching in the aggregate, the Republican candidate lost 21 votes, but gained 2 votes with the phantom voters for a total of 401 votes (net loss of 19 votes). The Democrat on the other hand added 48 votes from the phantom votes and 21 from the vote switching resulting in a narrowing of the Republican’s victory to 53.5% to 46.5%. So, instead of a 20 point victory, the Republican won by a 7 point margin. Evidence shows that this scenario happened in multiple deep red counties in Texas during the 2020 Presidential Election.

So let’s take a real world example in a county in Texas, Collin. Please remember that the average percentage turnout has been 69% in last 5 Presidential Elections (since 1996) in Collin county. The graphic below is taken from Dr. Frank’s analysis of Texas counties. The green vertical line is 61-year-olds in Collin. Typically, 6,900  61-year-olds vote in Collin (green vertical line with green circle), but in 2020 with the injection of phantom voting using the 2010 Census and a per-installed algorithmic key (with a coefficient of 0.999), that number increased to 8,100. So there are 1,200 phantom 61-year-old voters that can be allocated (most likely to the Democrat) in Collin. Let’s be not so generous and say only 80% went to Biden. That is an additional 960 votes added to Biden, and 240 votes for Trump.

Let’s make this real clear. This example is only one county with one age group. This resulted in a massive injection of phantom votes cast in Collin county to the tune of tens of thousands of illegal ballots. What is known as fact that an algorithmic key was used in every electronic voting machine in every county in Texas. That hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots were cast most likely for Democrats due to the anomalies favoring them. So, Texas what you going to do? Just let this fraud stand? Trump did not win Texas by 7 points, he won by 20 to 25 points, it is just the machines and those who has access to them made it look like Texas, deep Red, is now going Blue. We can either grab this bull by the horns, or get buried in its dookie.

Caveat: I have not verified these numbers om Collin county. I encourage the reader to do so.

Real Time Vote Switching (video)

So, people keep saying, where is the proof of election fraud? Well if we take the way-back machine to November 3rd and 4th, 2020 we have real-time evidence of votes being switched on live broadcasts. What is amazing is that no one seems to think this is a problem? Really? Hum. If you want to see evidence of the red flag of electronic voter fraud all we need to do is go to the video. (to see video click picture below).

Shocking History of Dominion Voting

Dominion Voting Systems Corp. is the Canadian company behind the ballot switching software.

Dominion was founded in 2003, with a mission to provide electronic voting systems friendly for progressives. Because of such partisanship, it languished with almost no customers for the next 5-6 years, until the Obama administration came to power. In 2010, the Obama administration confiscated electronic voting systems assets (software, intellectual property, manufacturing tools, customer base, etc.) from two established American companies, and gave them to Dominion. At the same time, Dominion got some employees and assets from a foreign EVS company, tied to Hugo Chavez.

Its software has been used by some 40% of the voters in this elections, mostly by Democrat-controlled states and election commissions. Apparently, no protections were put in place against ballot switching, deletion, or creation. According to Dominion’s own website, it software was used in “battleground” states and the largest Democrat states, including MI, GA, AZ, NV, NM, CO, AK, UT, NJ, CA, NY.

Dominion Early History

Dominion Voting System Corp., was founded in Canada in 2002-2003 with an openly progressive mission – to develop electronic voting software which would not just process ballots, but also “mobilize voters” – a popular slogan of the Left.

It is not clear what products or services the company has developed. It found almost no buyers, until Obama was elected in 2008. In 2009, New York ordered a few dozens of systems from it. In 2010, Obama’s DOJ (Holder – Mueller) took the EVS unit, purchased from Diebold, away from the market leader ES&S, and gave it to Dominion. This gift included the installed base of about 30% of the US electronic voting systems (EVS) market. Within two weeks, Dominion also acquired Sequoia, which was formally spun from Smartmatic, but ties between these two companies remained. Smartmatic is a UK based EVS vendor, whose software was used by Chavez to “win” the Venezuelan referendum in 2004. Smartmatic’s unit Sequoia faced troubles in the US. Those troubles quickly ended when its assets were purchased by Dominion.

Thus, the new Democratic party created a pocket pet corporation, gave it the lion share of the US electronic voting systems market. Dominion is ideologically aligned with the Democratic Party, owes it everything it has, dependent on it for most of its business, and needs it in power to avoid prosecution for corruption. Sounds like a conflict of interest.

Electronic Voting

Using electronic voting machines has always been controversial. The pros for electronic voting – saving working time of the ballot counters – are minuscule. The cons however are infinite. Because software is inherently complex, non-transparent, and volatile, there is always a risk of significant errors. There are also suspicions and doubts about election results. The complexity of software and hardware on which voting machines run has been continually increasing, aggravating these concerns.

At the beginning of 2009, there were four major US EVS suppliers: ES&S, Premier (a unit of Nixdorf-Diebold), Sequoia (linked to Smartmatic), and Hart Intercivic. The market size was a few hundred million dollars a year and growing. EVS vendors competed among themselves and against traditional pen and paper voting. There were no barriers to entry for other competitors, other than government’s regulations.

Electronic voting, which sounded like a good idea in the 1980s is so no more. Electronic voting machines and their vendors were under criticism for many years. In 2007-2008, this criticism materialized in the SEC, DOJ, and states lawsuits against the voting machines vendors. Diebold was catching flack for having a prominent Republican party supporter among their top executives. It spun its EVS unit as a separate company Premier, and was looking for a buyer.  The existing vendors were burdened with liabilities, including DOJ investigations. This opened up an opportunity for the Obama administration.

Technical Vulnerabilities of EVS Systems 

The voting software developers can easily insert code, changing numbers in favor of or against one candidate. No hacking is necessary. The malicious code can be designed to pass tests and to be triggered only at the time of a real election, automatically or manually. Both case are possible even the the machine is disconnected from the internet and has no ordinary I/O devices. The malicious code can be activated manually in real time by inserting a ballot or another paper with a pre-defined QR or image code. An audit of the source code is necessary, but not sufficient. Dominion software runs on Windows, and the malicious code can be hidden in any part of the operating system. Malicious code can be hidden in the firmware, too.

If a state wants to take risks and to rely on testing and the source code audit, they should be conducted with the participation of technically competent representatives of both parties. If the system passes testing and auditing, the machine image must be securely stored.  All supplied machines must have exactly the same hardware and the software as the audited system.

As far as I know, thorough tests and source code audits are conducted very rarely, if at all. Further, the vendors are not required to use only the audited image, and are allowed to update the software almost at will. That means that election commissions are forced to blindly trust the vendors. Blind trust is always wrong and invites abuse. But even “trust but verify” is applicable only to trustworthy vendors. Dominion Voting is the opposite of trustworthy.

The only real solution to the vulnerability of EVS is not to use them at all. Manual ballot counting has no software vulnerabilities, and is much cheaper. Virginia appears to be the only state that decided to use only manual ballots.

How Dominion went from nothing to everything in two weeks

In September 2009, ES&S acquired Premier [8], without any objections from the DOJ. But in March 2010, the Obama’s DOJ (Eric Holder – Robert Mueller) forced ES&S to “sell” Premier’s assets to Dominion, but to keep its liabilities. In addition, ES&S was forced to license to Dominion some of its software, in perpetuity and free of charge. The pretext for the DOJ action was antitrust.

The “Sale”

This is how the assets transfer was structured, per DOJ [1] (March 8, 2010).

“WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice announced today that it will require Election Systems & Software (ES&S) to divest voting equipment systems assets it purchased in September 2009 from Premier Election Solutions Inc. in order to restore competition. The assets to be divested include the means to produce all versions of Premier’s hardware, software and firmware used to record, tabulate, transmit or report votes, including the Assure 1.2 system, and a license to better serve disabled voters. The department said that today’s settlement will restore competition in voting equipment systems in the United States… “

“In order to restore competition” sounds funny, because the same document also required ES&S to not compete against the buyer (with exceptions).

“… the acquisition substantially reduced competition as it combined the two largest providers of systems used to tally votes in federal, state and local elections in the United States. ES&S’s acquisition of Premier made ES&S the provider of more than 70 percent of the voting equipment systems in the United States. The department said that because the cash value of the deal between ES&S and Premier was $5 million, far below the mandatory reporting threshold for mergers under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, the department’s investigation of the transaction did not begin until the companies had combined their assets and dismantled many of Premier’s operating divisions.” 

Sounds like a poor pretext. The DOJ has been investigating these companies even before the merger, and was aware of it. Further, the DOJ does not allege that the merger has not been reported. Even so, why not simply demand unrolling the merger? The DOJ provides a poor excuse to demand divestiture rather than a normal unrolling.

“Under the terms of the settlement, ES&S must divest all of the intellectual property associated with all versions –past, present and in development –of the Premier voting equipment systems to another company. ES&S also must divest all Premier tooling and fixed assets, as well as inventory of parts and components. In order to allow the divestiture buyer to better serve disabled voters, ES&S must also grant a fully paid-up, irrevocable, perpetual license to use the AutoMARK, ES&S’s ballot marking device for which Premier had a limited license prior to the acquisition. The buyer of the divestiture assets will have the right to modify and improve both Premier products and the AutoMARK.”

Thus, the Obama’s DOJ stripped ES&S not only acquired Premier assets, but also coerced it to license rights to its pre-merger product.

“ES&S must sell the divestiture assets to a buyer approved by the department.”

This is not selling. This is confiscation multiplied by corruption.

“The settlement prohibits ES&S from bidding on new voting equipment system contracts using the Premier equipment. [transferred to Dominion]”

Wait, didn’t they say that the purpose was to increase the competition?

“The department also required that ES&S grant the divestiture buyer an opportunity to compete to provide services to Premier customers currently under contract with ES&S, giving customers the option to switch to the divestiture buyer or to remain with ES&S … ES&S also must provide access to knowledgeable Premier employees and agree to offer a supply agreement to allow the divestiture buyer time to establish its own manufacturing of voting equipment systems.”

The approved divestiture buyer, Dominion Voting, is not mentioned in this press release. But this quote shows that the DOJ has already determined the “approved buyer,” and knew that it had no manufacturing base.

After the “Sale”

Dominion announced the acquisition of the Diebold products on May 19, 2010 [2] and the acquisition of Sequoia Voting assets on June 4, 2010 [3]. Dominion also hired much of its personnel, probably retaining ties to extremely sketchy Smartmatic. Sequoia/Smartmatic systems had been used in the Venezuela 2004 referendum, which Hugo Chavez “won”.  Smartmatic is a British company with Hugo Chavez ties, headed by “Lord” Malloch-Brown (former UN Deputy Secretary-General, UNDP, UNHCR, VP of Soros’ Quantum Fund, and Vice Chair of Soros’ Open Society Foundation) [7], and linked to electoral scandals all over the world [5].

In August 2019, the rough breakdown of the EVS market in the US was (per Brad Feldman):

40% ES&S
30% Diebold/Premier
20% Sequoia/Smartmatic
10% Hart Intercivic
0% Dominion Voting

Less than a year later, after the “antitrust” actions of Obama’s DOJ, it became:

50% Dominion
40% ES&S (restricted in competing against Dominion)
10% Hart Intercivic

Thus, the DOJ’s actions did the exact opposite of its words.

An elections system vendor should be non-partisan, in a demonstrable way. Dominion is not just partisan, but hyper-partisan in favor of the Democrat party, or even its pocket vendor.

Dominion has many more ties to the Democrat party and its prominent supporters in the US and abroad, which are not covered in this article.

Software Development in Serbia

Dominion develops much of its software in Belgrade, Serbia. Russia is a close friend to Serbia, if not its only one. If anybody sincerely thought that Putin wanted to hack American elections, their first location of interest would be the offices of Dominion Voting in Belgrade, rather than the Trump Tower in New York.

By the way, Serbian and Russian languages use the Cyrillic alphabet. Most letters have the same Unicode encoding in Serbian and Russian (the Basic Multilingual Plane, range 0410-04FF). If any election officials found Cyrillic text on a Dominion voting machine in 2016, it was probably left by its developers in Serbia.


This is the Agreement between Michigan & Dominion, including specs of many Dominion products (PDF, 161 pages). Wi-fi connection and even a dial up modem are offered as an option.

Some of the companies referenced here as foreign based or foreign originating re-registered in the US.

Some References

[1] Justice Department Requires Key Divestiture in Election Systems & Software/Premier Election Solutions Merger,, March 8, 2010

[2] Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Acquires Premier Election Solutions Assets From ES&S, press release, May 19

[3] Dominion Voting Systems Corporation Acquires Assets of Sequoia Voting Systems, press release, June 4, 2010

[3b] On Heels of Diebold/Premier Purchase, Canadian Firm Also Acquires Sequoia, Lies About Chavez-Ties in Announcement – contemporary commentary

[4] Marcos warns of ‘another Smartmatic situation’ – Smartmatic was accused of election fraud in the 2016 elections in Philippines

[5] Smartmatic in Wikipedia, November 9, 2020 (not verified)

[6] Sequoia Voting Systems in Wikipedia, November 9, 2020 (not verified)

[7] Lord Malloch Brown in Wikipedia, November 8, 2010 (not verified)

[8] Diebold Sells U.S. Elections Systems Business to ES&S, press release, September 3, 2009

[9] Dominion Voting Systems Corp – discussion of Dominion’s ideology and highly partisan offers

via Science Defies Politics

Georgia audit documents expose significant election failures in Fulton

Documents that Georgia’s largest county submitted to state officials as part of a post-election audit highlight significant irregularities in the Atlanta area during last November’s voting, ranging from identical vote tallies repeated multiple times to large batches of absentee ballots that appear to be missing from the official ballot-scanning records.

The revelations come as a state judge has taken the extraordinary step of ordering absentee ballots in the county unsealed so that a private audit led by lawyer Bob Cheeley can examine the actual papers and resolve discrepancies. Cheeley told Just the News on Wednesday the evidence he has seen so far points to “election tabulation malpractice.”

More here:

A second state official said the shoddy nature of the Fulton County paperwork left open the possibility fraud or other misconduct occurred. “An audit is only as good as the data that’s input, and in this case Fulton County’s records are so problematic I’m not sure a reasonable person can trust them,” the official said. “When you add in the reports of ballots magically appearing under tables or being moved out of the counting center, there are legitimate outstanding questions.”

Easy to Vote, Hard to Cheat

June 17, 2021

Easy to Vote, Hard to Cheat
(AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

America’s voting system is in trouble. To do its job, it needs to produce clear and trustworthy outcomes. It’s not enough to produce a winner and loser. The losers have to believe that they lost fair and square, and the public has to have enough confidence in the system to be skeptical when sore losers claim fraud.

We don’t have that right now. To get there, we need paper ballots, voter ID, and open counting – plus a bit of self-restraint among our political class. Across much of America, voting is now done by computerized devices. Computers have many advantages: They’re fast, they’re easy to program (compared with changing printed ballots), and they produce rapid results that can be quickly reported.

But they also have problems. One is that to trust a computer, you have to trust the people who wrote its software, and everyone else who may have had an opportunity to change that software. Devices that connect to the Internet also raise the risk that people on the other side of the world might change the software or the results.

Since 2020, such worries have often been dismissed as right-wing propaganda, but just before the election USA Today published a roundup of concerns about electronic voting that cited numerous computer scientists. Conclusion: “All election systems are for the most part black boxes: proprietary software and hardware jealously guarded by the handful of companies selling them. But state reviews and court cases opening up DRE [direct-recording electronic] systems of all makes and models for examination have for years flagged problems.”

“The whole community of computer scientists is mystified why election officials will not listen to experts about technology but will listen to the vendors” selling and maintaining it, said computer scientist Duncan Buell of the University of South Carolina.

Prior to the 2020 election, several prominent Democrats, including Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, and Ron Wyden, sent a letter citing reports of vote-switching by machines manufactured by Dominion Systems. They wrote: “These problems threaten the integrity of our elections and demonstrate the importance of election systems that are strong, durable, and not vulnerable to attack.”

They were right. Whether or not voting machines were actually compromised, if people can’t trust them, they’re no good. So, we need something more trustworthy. How do we do that?

Paper ballots, voter ID, and open counting, for a start. Paper ballots aren’t fraud-proof, but they have several advantages over electronic voting machines. First, they can’t be hacked by someone in Minsk or Guangdong. To change a paper ballot, you need physical access.

What’s more, while you can change a vote tally in a computer by flipping some bits – and bits are interchangeable – paper ballots capture more information than simply votes for or against a candidate. Erasing original votes is likely to leave some residue.

Creating large numbers of fake ballots is also harder. Computer votes have no identifying characteristics. Details of handwriting, ink color, and so on make each paper ballot unique. If you mass-produced completed ballots, it would be much harder to make them look genuine; a Xerox machine wouldn’t do the job.

Of course, votes need to be genuine. Voter fraud is itself a species of voter suppression. If a fraudulent voter casts a ballot, that ballot neutralizes the vote of a legitimate voter who chose a different candidate.

Many states (including mine, Tennessee) require a photo ID to vote, as is the custom around the world. Voting by mail is frowned upon. In Europe, 63% of countries ban mail-in ballots except for citizens living abroad; another 22% ban mail-in ballots even for overseas citizens. Most countries that allow mail-in ballots require people to show an ID to obtain one. Some countries – including those where the U.S. has tried to boost democracy, such as Afghanistan and Iraq – have gone further, marking voters (remember the famous “purple finger” photos?) to prevent repeat voting.

The goal is simple: one person, one vote – with both person and vote authenticated.

I’m not the only one to endorse paper ballots. After the Democrats’ Iowa caucuses debacle last year, where a smartphone voting app failed miserably, the New York Times ran a piece headlined “The only safe election is a low-tech election.”

And as Senator (now Vice President) Kamala Harris noted, “Russia can’t hack a piece of paper.”

Of course, to be trusted, votes must also be counted fairly. I recommend an open count at each polling place. Counting votes on the spot would eliminate problems with ballots being “lost” on the way to a central counting facility or being “discovered” in the trunk of a car during the count. Everything should be done out in the open.

There should also be accountability for voting officials. Votes lost or found? You lose your job. The responsibility is vital, and there should be serious consequences for failure or dereliction.

Finally, we need a better political culture. Politicians were once unwilling to challenge elections for fear of looking like sore losers. That has changed. From the “hanging chad” recounts in 2000 to the Diebold conspiracy theories of 2004 to claims of a “hacked election” in 2016 to the ongoing hysteria about the 2020 election, charges of fraud, made by major political figures, have become normal.

This may help fire up the base and generate media clicks, but it’s destructive – and it undercuts the credibility of any genuine charges of fraud that may emerge. True, reforming our political culture, which I regard as deeply dysfunctional, may be asking too much. All the more reason to support paper ballots, voter ID, and open counting on-site. Adopting these methods would do much to promote political trust, and political legitimacy, in a nation sorely in need of both.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds is Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Tennessee, and founder of the Instapundit political blog.

CNN Proves that Electronic Voting Machines are Venezuelan

Remember the days with CNN actually did investigative journalism and reported the news before they became the Communist Narrative Network? Well, way back in 2006 they proved two things: First, Smartmatic / Dominion machines were owned by Venezuelans, and secondly, you could run unlimited ballots through a machine.

Incredibly, after the 2020 election, CNN labeled Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani, and Donald Trump “conspiracy theorist” for even mentioning our voting machines ties to Venezuela and Hugo Chavez. They even went as far as labeling the concept of “voting machine fraud” a “conspiracy theory.” The only problem was… CNN previously reported on our voting machines being tied to Venezuela and Hugo Chavez as well as our voting machine’s ability to commit election fraud.

Remember those red flags of electronic election fraud. The mainstream media thinks it is a sophisticated modern digital propaganda weaponized against the American people, they are simply in the business of telling lies, hiding the truth, and controlling the narrative. We now know this, and thank you CNN for your investigative journalism and showing America that you are no longer newsworthy.

Example of Electronic Election Fraud in Texas, Tarrant County

While many of the issues of electronic election fraud seem to be far, far away from Texas in the swings states of Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, in order to see how electronic voter fraud took place in Texas you have to look at the largest Red county in the country to see how the election was manipulated. As mentioned earlier in the video Scientific Proof, Dr. Frank was able to prove that voter rolls were all mysteriously all increased to allow the Democrats the ability to add phantom voters without anyone being the wiser. Not only did the vote manipulation consist of altering in person voting totals, it dealt with mail-in ballots and absentee ballots. As this tweet from November 5, 2020 indicates, that a traditionally red county swung to blue by 427 votes although the outcome for the state of Texas did not change, but it did. This county actually had a massive amount of votes flipped.

So here is the rundown and if you look at my post about electronic voting red flags: Red Flags for Electronic Election Fraud you will see all the familiar indicators that fraud was taking place in Tarrant County. Below are some of the highlights of the 2020 Election in Tarrant County, Texas.

  • Trump is ahead on November 4th but the mail-in ballots just keep coming and Voila! They flip the largest red Urban County in the USA.
  • Several Tarrant County Precincts recorded more than 100% voter turnout (big increase in voter turnout red flag)
  • As of November 6th there were an estimated 28,016 defective (Runbeck) ballots that had been or needed to be adjudicated (high failure rate red flag)
  • There is an increase in “registered” voters that almost perfectly matches the adjudications (Phantom Voters red flag)

Then there is a statistical anomaly on the “increase” in voters going primarily to one candidate as highlighted below. That “just enough” new voters were added to flip the county for Biden (which is another big red flag).

Then there is the coup de grâce, where the predicted voter turnout as demonstrated by Dr. Frank matches exactly with with the “electronic tally” says it did. In fact, it does not. Many of the votes cast are not real and machines again have electronically stuffed the ballot box. This is how you do it, add “phantom votes” and weight them heavily to one candidate.

Again, what makes this significant is that to most people this will go undetected. Why? Because it did not flip Texas, but did flip a big, traditionally red county blue. It did it not by the voters, but by the machines. This is just one of the ways the Democrats thought they would flip Texas. Luckily, Trump voters came out in such large numbers, that it did not happen, but it will in the near future if we do not get forensic audit done in a last Tarrant County.

What Maricopa is Really About

You are watching the planned demolition of the American Oligarchy (or the corrupt make-believe two-party system). It is about all the swamp creatures being uncovered. Not all actors in this freak show are willing participants. Many are trapped by their own crimes and associations of truly corrupt individuals.

The Art of War is about knowing the enemy and reducing their freedom of action until the only path left to them, is the one you want them to take.

Very easy to predict Maricopa Officials would deny, deny, deny and hope for no audit (based on past cheating that was never investigated although known.)

Maricopa Board of Supervisors are STILL holding back routers, SPLUNK records, and more. Like the Mafia: “never confess, never back down!” Who does that sound like (Hillary)?

Think about the optics of their position AFTER full evidence of ballot fuckery is truly out. Who are they going to call then? Nancy? Soros? Ghostbusters?

Will they (the fraudsters) pretend to be shocked and suddenly appear to cooperate? Will they turtle up and plead the 5th? Will they keep hoping the Deep State is going to bail them out?

When will they figure out this time is not like the past, the outcome is not the same, and very different players are pulling the strings?

Thanks for playing

Arizona Election Numbers: DEMs Grew Maricopa 337K (118K was the record)


Former Army Captain of Military Intelligence, Seth Keshel (, breaks down the election data in Maricopa County.

Arizona has historically been a Republican state.

Since WWII, Arizona has only voted for a Democrat for President twice, 1948 and 1996. Maricopa has not voted for the Democrat since 1948.

John Kerry added 118,166 votes in Maricopa in 2004.

Barack Obama added 97,677 votes in Maricopa in 2008.

Hillary Clinton added 100,619 votes in Maricopa in 2016.

Joe Biden added 337,867 votes in Maricopa in 2020.

Biden won Arizona by 10,457 votes. So if as little as 0.5% of the 2.1 million ballots in Maricopa are illegal or invalid ballots for Biden then you have a state for the first time in the history of the United States that would have been wrongfully awarded in the American electoral college. And if it happened in Maricopa, you can be sure that it happened elsewhere.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D) explains why the full forensic audit is vital to restoring election integrity in America

Here is a video about a US Senator from Oregon warning us about electronic voting machines vulnerabilities to hacking. He states the ONLY way to prove that any election if valid is to do a full forensic audit. Here are some of his quotes:

“The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions nationwide use election management systems that run on old software.. ripe for exploitation by hackers.. PA, WI, MI, FL, IA, IN, AZ, & NC among others are all at risk. Even GA, which passed legislation to buy new voting machines is on track to buy equipment that suffers from the significant cyber security weakness.”

“Our elections weren’t secure last week and they sure as heck aren’t secure this week and anybody who says otherwise is either selling you voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections.”

“At one point in the I.C., both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed in the 2016 election. And, I said, the experts I talk to say that until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you got in there and scrub the whole system, you can’t really say that.”

Here is a link to the video:

Granted, this video is PRIOR to the 2020 Elections, but it is no less compelling and true. ALL ELECTRONIC VOTING CAN BE HACKED, PERIOD

Red Flags for Electronic Election Fraud

The basic tenets of conducting a proper and secure vote include ensuring one vote per voter, maintaining voter anonymity, guaranteeing accuracy of vote count, securing the integrity of the system, and preventing the possibility of fraud. This is where electronic voting begins to become suspect. it has become evident that these voting principals cannot be maintained with an electronic voting system. The three (3) general complaints with electronic voting systems are: issues with using proprietary technology and technology in general, vast possibilities of fraud both internally and externally, and lack of protection with voters information and their votes. This site will only be identifying the red flags that deal with opportunities of electronic voting fraud.

With electronic machine voting also comes the higher possibilities of fraudulent vote counting and vote tallies. It starts with the public not being allowed to access the software that controls the voting machines or to do a pre-election stress test of the veracity of a voting system. Although companies say they designed their software to ensure against fraud, due to the proprietary nature of their software and a lack of transparency into the workings of the machines, the public has no idea of how the voting software works or if it is really secure against malicious attacks or internal manipulation of votes or vote totals. Under these conditions, it would be simple for the company to configure their software to produce fraudulent results. And as we are finding out, there is no guarantee that vendors are supplying machines with the best interest of the voters’ or that deliver accurate election results.

And that leaves us with numerous red flags concerning vote and vote totals manipulation. Electronic voting can and has changed votes en mass. If implemented correctly, these changes could be undetected. The software can be programmed to only flip, alter or add a few hundred or few thousand votes at the precinct level. But taken to the extreme over an entire State, changes might be in the hundreds of thousands of votes, as we saw in the 2020 Election, that negatively effected the outcome.

So, when a complete forensic audit is conducted some major red flags are expected to become evident which indicate electronic voter fraud. These red flags are high ballot error rates, terminals connected to an outside public network, unscheduled software updates to terminals, weighted or fractional (decimal) voting, decrements in voting totals and flip totals, ghost or phantom voting, deletion of voting records or server logs, large unusual increases in aged voting (usually seniors), and margins of victories identical over multiple precincts. These are outlined in more detail below.

Elections Can Be Stolen, Oh Wait, It Was


As we got closer to the 2020 election, it seems corporate media was really getting scared that Trump would win, and pushed their narrative that he was going to cheat bigly and STEAL the election. What the corporate media did not know, it was the DEMs who put the fix in. No one let them in on the plan, apparently. Just a shit load of fraud that I do not know if it will ever get corrected or prosecuted. Crimes were committed, but just like the democrats to consistently sweep it under the carpet when their side does it. Oh, and the cheating was yuge and Biden is the Cheater and Thief.

The Hill: Voting machines pose a greater threat to our elections than foreign agents (Oct 2, 2019)

CBS: Why voting machines in the U.S. are easy targets for hackers (September 19, 2018)

Salon: New “hybrid” voting system can change paper ballot after it’s been cast (Mar 28, 2019)

AP: Exclusive: New Election systems use vulnerable software (July 13, 2019)

Newsweek: Election Hacking: Voting-Machine Supplier Admits It Used Hackable Software Despite Past Denials (July 17, 2018)

TechCrunch: Senators demand to know why election vendors still sell voting machines with ‘known vulnerabilities’ (Mar 27, 2019)

RollingStone: John Oliver Breaks Down Faulty Election Machine Security on ‘Last Week Tonight’ (November 4, 2019)

WaPo: The Cybersecurity 202: U.S. voting machines vulnerable to hacks in 2020, researchers find (Sep 27, 2019)

New York Times: America’s Elections Could Be Hacked. Go Vote Anyway (October 19, 2018)

MIT Tech Review: 16 million Americans will vote on hackable paperless machines (Aug 13, 2019)

AJC: In high-stakes election, Georgia’s voting system vulnerable to cyberattack (Oct 23, 2020)

So, you keep wanting Election Fraud proof, well, here is Pennsylvania

What always amazes me is why no election officials from the states looked into the “anomalies” of votes being flipped in their states. Looking at the quotes from the Pennsylvania Secretary of State, Attorney General, and Governor, you can see why fraud was so easily overlooked and even enabled. These are criminal acts. This does NOT even account for all the pallets of ballots brought into PA as well.


This video presentation (see link at bottom of this post) was done by a team of data scientists and programmers with experience working for the US Navy, the CIA, the National Counter-Terrorism Center, and a Big-Four Accounting Firm.🔻

There were 423,116 votes subtracted from Trump in the Pennsylvania data. (that means he received votes, and someone just had them deleted, not in error, but deliberately)

If you look at the data for Allegheny County, 145,000 absentee votes were deleted for Trump. Over 27,000 votes were also removed from Trump’s election day votes.

In Chester County, Trump loses over 41,000 votes from his election day vote totals and nearly 50,000 votes from his absentee vote totals. In total, over 91,000 votes are subtracted from Trump.

In Lehigh County, Trump receives an initial 66,179 votes which are then taken away from his vote total.

Again, this is something that should *NEVER* occur in an additive voting process.

People always ask why nothing ever happens with all the fraud we present❓

Take a look at the words of these elected officials in Pennsylvania:

“A Trump presidency would significantly weaken the US, driving us into a lengthy recession. Using the title ‘President before the word ‘Trump’ really demeans the office of the presidency…”
-SOS Kathy Boockvar

“Pennsylvania had a fair and secure election free of intervention, and our commonwealth will not tolerate these senseless attempts to silence the voices of millions of Pennsylvanians. It’s time to accept reality and move on.”
-Gov. Tom Wolf

“It’s January 2, 2021, and this is a reminder that no amount of frivolous, meritless legal filings, chest-thumping by sycophant congressmen or tweets by the sitting president is going to change the fact that in 18 days Joe Biden will be sworn in as our new President.”
-AG Josh Shapiro

“I said the other day and I’ll repeat. I don’t know if they need a surgeon to repair their spines or a psychiatrist to examine their heads but something is wrong with these people that are willing to follow Donald Trump as far as he is trying to take them.”
-AG Josh Shapiro

Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar, Governor Tom Wolf, and Attorney General Josh Shapiro have made it very clear that they have no interest in looking into where these 423,116 errors on election day went.

After seeing the data provided and the comments of Pennsylvania’s leadership, do you believe a free and fair election was carried out? Do you think that these elected officials will pursue an unbiased investigation into these findings to ensure that the votes of their constituents were counted

This presentation have never been debunked nor refuted. It is just the facts.

Pennsylvania was Stolen – Here is the Evidence
Here is a video outlining the fraud in Pennsylvania during the 2020 Election. Pennsylvania leadership is absolutely corrupt.

Gaslighting – Making you think the truth is not real

As we continue to live in an Orwellian Twilight Zone episode of biblical proportions.. wow, did I just write that? I have to ask myself, what went wrong? How did we get to where we are and who is culpable? The answer, the 4th Estate (also known as the media) failed us. They are supposed to rail against he abuses of the three branches of government, but instead it has morphed into a mouthpiece of the of anti-American socialists. It essentially no longer exists as the “free press” but instead is used as a tool to sabotage people who actually bring facts to bear. Literally and figuratively, the main stream media and social media has moved to a position that it should be banned and outlawed as propagandists. The communists would be proud. They no longer report facts, but now only convey opinions of one view exclusively. We no longer have a free press in America. In any case, I thought an explanation is order so you will recognize gaslighting when you see it.


The term originates in the systematic psychological manipulation of a victim by her husband in Patrick Hamilton’s 1938 stage play Gas Light, and the film adaptations released in 1940 and 1944. In the story, the husband attempts to convince his wife and others that she is insane by manipulating small elements of their environment and insisting that she is mistaken, remembering things incorrectly, or delusional when she points out these changes. The play’s title alludes to how the abusive husband slowly dims the gas lights in their home, while pretending nothing has changed, in an effort to make his wife doubt her own perceptions. The wife repeatedly asks her husband to confirm her perceptions about the dimming lights, but in defiance of reality, he keeps insisting that the lights are the same and instead it is she who is going insane.  (sound familiar?)

Today we are living in a perpetual state of gaslighting. The reality that we are being told by the media is at complete odds with what we are seeing with our own two eyes. And when we question the false reality that we are being presented, or we claim that what we see is that actual reality, we are vilified as racist or bigots or just plain crazy. You’re not racist. You’re not crazy. You’re being gaslighted.

New York State has twice as many deaths from the Wuhan Flu than any other state, and New York has accounted for one fifth of all Wuhan Flu deaths, but we are told that New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has handled the pandemic better than any other governor. But if we support policies of Governors whose states had only a fraction of the infections and deaths as New York, we are called anti-science and want people to die. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

We see mobs of people looting stores, smashing windows, setting cars on fire and burning down buildings, but we are told that these demonstrations are peaceful protests And when we call this destruction of our cities, riots, we are called racists. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

We see the major problem destroying many inner-cities is crime; murder, gang violence, drug dealing, drive-by shootings, armed robbery, but we are told that it is not crime, but the police that are the problem in the inner-cities. We are told we must defund the police and remove law enforcement from crime-riddled cities to make them safer. But if we advocate for more policing in cities overrun by crime, we are accused of being white supremacists and racists. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

The United States of America accepts more immigrants than any other country in the world. The vast majority of the immigrants are “people of color”, and these immigrants are enjoying freedom and economic opportunity not available to them in their country of origin, but we are told that the United States is the most racist and oppressive country on the planet, and if we disagree, we are called racist and xenophobic. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Capitalist countries are the most prosperous countries in the world. The standard of living is the highest in capitalist countries. We see more poor people move up the economic ladder to the middle and even the wealthy class through their effort and ability in capitalist countries than any other economic system in the world, but we are told capitalism is an oppressive system designed to keep people down. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Communist countries killed over 100 million people in the 20th century. Communist countries strip their citizens of basic human rights, dictate every aspect of their lives, treat their citizens as slaves, and drive their economies into the ground, but we are told that Communism is the fairest, most equitable, freest, and most prosperous economic system in the world. How can that be? So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

The most egregious example of gaslighting is the concept of “white fragility”. You spend your life trying to be a good person, trying to treat people fairly and with respect. You disavow racism and bigotry in all its forms. You judge people solely on the content of their character and not by the color of their skin. You don’t discriminate based on race or ethnicity. But you are told you are a racist, not because of something you did or said, but solely because of the color of your skin. You know instinctively that charging someone with racism because of their skin color is itself racist. You know that you are not racist, so you defend yourself and your character, but you are told that your defense of yourself is proof of your racism. So, we ask ourselves, am I crazy? No, you’re being gaslighted.

Gaslighting has become one of the most pervasive and destructive tactics in American politics. It is the exact opposite of what our political system was meant to be. It deals in lies and psychological coercion, and not the truth and intellectual discourse. If you ever ask yourself if you’re crazy, you are not. Crazy people aren’t sane enough to ask themselves if they’re crazy. So, trust yourself, believe what’s in your heart. Trust your eyes over what you are told. Never listen to the people who tell you that you are crazy, because you are not, you’re being gaslighted.

Sophocles said: “What people believe prevails over the truth.”

And that’s what the media are trying to exploit.

Hacking an Election: The date of demarcation


After Nov. 3, 2020 the corporate media told you it was *IMPOSSIBLE* to hack an American election.  But before Nov. 3, the corporate media told you it was *EASY* to hack an American election. Wonder what changed? Nothing… it is still easy to hack an election even after a bill was passed to do so. Guess what, nothing in that bill was about computer security, so there you have it. This list is just outlining how easy it is to hack a machine post the 2016 elections (um, when Trump won, bigly), not so much how vulnerable an election would be with a coordinated attack on these systems.

In any case, here is an EXTENSIVE listing of articles from predominately left-leaning corporate media sites stating emphatically that hacking an election is not only possible, but has been ongoing for some time. It is amazing the hypocrisy of these alleged news organizations to change their tune when it was totally obvious that Joe Biden got elected due to extensive hacking from primarily the Chines Communist Party and the leftist that colluded with them.  Titles and links follow.

Politico: How to Hack an Election in 7 Minutes (Aug 5, 2016)

FOX: Princeton Professor demonstrates how to hack a voting machine (Sep 18, 2016)

PBS: Recounts or no, U.S. elections are still vulnerable to hacking (December 26, 2016)

CNET: Defcon hackers find it’s very easy to break voting machines (July 30, 2017)

CNN: We watched hackers break into voting machines (Aug 11, 2017)

NYT: I Hacked an Election. So Can the Russians. (April 5, 2018)

Axios: There’s more than one way to hack an election (July 3, 2018)

Bloomberg: Expensive, Glitchy Voting Machines Expose 2020 Hacking Risks (Nov 8, 2019)

NBC: ‘Online and vulnerable’: Experts find nearly three dozen U.S. voting systems connected to internet (Jan 10, 2020)

Guardian: Hack the vote: terrifying film shows how vulnerable US elections are (Mar 26, 2020)

MotherJones: Researchers Assembled over 100 Voting Machines. Hackers Broke Into Every Single One. (Sep 27, 2019)

WaPo: Hackers were told to break into U.S. voting machines. They didn’t have much trouble. (Aug 12, 2019)

USA Today: Will your ballot be safe? Computer experts sound warnings on America’s voting machines (Nov 2, 2020)

Vice: Critical US Election Systems Have Been Left Exposed Online (Aug 8, 2019)

SA: The Vulnerabilities of Our Voting Machines (Nov 1, 2018)

Slate: America’s Voting Systems Are Highly Vulnerable to Hackers (Feb 22, 2018)

Salon: Hackers can easily break into voting machines used across the US (August 14, 2019)

CNN: Watch this hacker break into a voting machine (Aug 10, 2019)

PBS: An 11-year-old changed election results on a replica Florida state website in under 10 minutes (Aug 12, 2018)

The Criminalization of Dissent

One of the hallmarks of totalitarian systems is the criminalization of dissent. Not just the stigmatization of dissent or the demonization of dissent, but the formal criminalization of dissent, and any other type of opposition to the official ideology of the totalitarian system. Global capitalism has been inching its way toward this step for quite some time, and now, apparently, it is ready to take it.

Germany has been leading the way. For over a year, anyone questioning or protesting the “Covid emergency measures” or the official Covid-19 narrative has been demonized by the government and the media, and, sadly, but not completely unexpectedly, the majority of the German public. And now such dissent is officially “extremism.”

Yes, that’s right, in “New Normal” Germany, if you dissent from the official state ideology, you are now officially a dangerous “extremist.” The German Intelligence agency (the “BfV”) has even invented a new category of “extremists” in order to allow themselves to legally monitor anyone suspected of being “anti-democratic and/or delegitimizing the state in a way that endangers security,” like … you know, non-violently protesting, or speaking out against, or criticizing, or satirizing, the so-called “New Normal.”

Naturally, I’m a little worried, as I have engaged in most of these “extremist” activities. My thoughtcrimes are just sitting there on the Internet waiting to be scrutinized by the BfV. They’re probably Google-translating this column right now, compiling a list of all the people reading it, and their Facebook friends and Twitter followers, and professional associates, and family members, and anyone any of the aforementioned people have potentially met with, or casually mentioned, who might have engaged in similar thought-crimes.

You probably think I’m joking, don’t you? I’m not joking. Not even slightly. The Federal Office for Protection of the Constitution (“Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz”) is actively monitoring anyone questioning or challenging the official “New Normal” ideology … the “Covid Deniers,” the “conspiracy theorists,” the “anti-vaxxers,” the dreaded “Querdenkers” (i.e., people who “think outside the box”), and anyone else they feel like monitoring who has refused to join the Covidian Cult. We’re now official enemies of the state, no different than any other “terrorists” … or, OK, technically, a little different.

As The New York Times reported last week (German Intelligence Puts Coronavirus Deniers Under Surveillance), “the danger from coronavirus deniers and conspiracy theorists does not fit the mold posed by the usual politically driven groups, including those on the far left and right, or by Islamic extremists.” Still, according to the German Interior Ministry, we diabolical “Covid deniers,” “conspiracy theorists,” and “anti-vaxxers” have “targeted the state itself, its leaders, businesses, the press, and globalism,” and have “attacked police officers” and “defied civil authorities.”

Moreover, back in August of 2020, in a dress rehearsal for the “Storming of the Capitol,” “Covid-denying” insurrectionists “scaled the steps of Parliament” (i.e., the Reichstag). Naturally, The Times neglects to mention that this so-called “Storming of the Reichstag” was performed by a small sub-group of protesters to whom the German authorities had granted a permit to assemble (apart from the main demonstration, which was massive and completely peaceful) on the steps of the Reichstag, which the German police had, for some reason, left totally unguarded. In light of the background of the person the German authorities issued this “Steps-of-the-Reichstag” protest permit to — a known former-NPD functionary, in other words, a neo-Nazi — well, the whole thing seemed a bit questionable to me … but what do I know? I’m just a “conspiracy theorist.”

According to Al Jazeera, the German Interior Ministry explained that these querkening “extremists encourage supporters to ignore official orders and challenge the state monopoly on the use of force.” Seriously, can you imagine anything more dangerous? Mindlessly following orders and complying with the state’s monopoly on the use of force are the very cornerstones of modern democracy … or some sort of political system, anyway.

But, see, there I go, again “being anti-democratic” and “delegitimizing the state,” not to mention “relativizing the Holocaust” (also a criminal offense in Germany) by comparing one totalitarian system to another, as I have done repeatedly on social media, and in a column I published in November of 2020, when the parliament passed the “Infection Protection Act,” which bears no comparison whatsoever to the “Enabling Act of 1933.”

This isn’t just a German story, of course. As I reported in a column in February, The “New Normal” War on Domestic Terror is a global war, and it’s just getting started. According to a Department of Homeland SecurityNational Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin(and the “liberal” corporate-media propaganda machine), “democracy” remains under imminent threat from these “ideologically-motivated violent extremists with objections to the exercise of governmental authority” and other such “grievances fueled by false narratives” including “anger over Covid-19 restrictions.”

These Covid-denying “violent extremists” have apparently joined forces with the “white-supremacist, Russia-backed, Trump-loving “Putin-Nazis” that terrorized “democracy” for the past four years, and almost overthrew the US government by sauntering around inside the US Capitol Building without permission, scuffling with police, attacking furniture, and generally acting rude and unruly. No, they didn’t actually kill anyone, as the corporate media all reported they did, but trespassing in a government building and putting your feet up on politicians’ desks is pretty much exactly the same as “terrorism.”

Or whatever. It’s not like the truth actually matters, not when you are whipping up mass hysteria over imaginary “Russian assets,” “white-supremacist militias,” “Covid-denying extremists,” “anti-vax terrorists,” and “apocalyptic plagues.” When you’re rolling out a new official ideology — a pathologized-totalitarian ideology — and criminalizing all dissent, the point is not to appear to be factual. The point is just to terrorize the shit out of people.

As Hermann Goering famously explained regarding how to lead a country to war (and the principle holds true for any big transition, like the one we are experiencing currently):

“[T]he people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger.”

Go back and read those quotes from the German Interior Ministry and the DHS again slowly. The message they are sending is unmistakably clear. It might not seem all that new, but it is. Yes, they have been telling us “we are being attacked” and denouncing critics, protesters, and dissidents for twenty years (i.e., since the War on Terror was launched in 2001, and for the last four years in their War on Populism), but this is a whole new level of it … a fusion of official narratives and their respective official enemies into a singular, aggregate official narrative in which dissent will no longer be permitted.

Instead, it will be criminalized, or it will be pathologized.

Seriously, go back and read those quotes again. Global capitalist governments and their corporate media mouthpieces are telling us, in no uncertain terms, that “objection to their authority” will no longer be tolerated, nor will dissent from their official narratives. Such dissent will be deemed “dangerous” and above all “false.” It will not be engaged with or rationally debated. It will be erased from public view. There will be an inviolable, official “reality.” Any deviation from official “reality” or defiance of the “civil authorities” will be labelled “extremism,” and dealt with accordingly.

This is the essence of totalitarianism, the establishment of an inviolable official ideology and the criminalization of dissent. And that is what is happening, right now. A new official ideology is being established. Not a state ideology. A global ideology. The “New Normal” is that official ideology. Technically, it is an official post-ideology, an official “reality,” an axiomatic “fact,” which only “criminals” and “psychopaths” would deny.

I’ll be digging deeper into “New Normal” ideology and “pathologized totalitarianism” in my future columns, and … sorry, they probably won’t be very funny. For now I’ll leave you with two more quotes. The emphasis is mine, as ever.

Here’s California State Senator Richard Pan, author of an op-ed in the Washington Post: “Anti-vax extremism is akin to domestic terrorism,” quoted in the Los Angeles Times:

“These extremists have not yet been held accountable, so they continue to escalate violence against the body public … We must now summon the political will to demand that domestic terrorists face consequences for their words and actions. Our democracy and our lives depend on it … They’ve been building alliances with white supremacists, conspiracy theorists and [others] on the far right …”

And here’s Peter Hotez in Nature magazine:

“The United Nations and the highest levels of governments must take direct, even confrontational, approaches with Russia, and move to dismantle anti-vaccine groups in the United States. Efforts must expand into the realm of cyber security, law enforcement, public education and international relations. A high-level inter-agency task force reporting to the UN secretary-general could assess the full impact of anti-vaccine aggression, and propose tough, balanced measures. The task force should include experts who have tackled complex global threats such as terrorism, cyber attacks and nuclear armament, because anti-science is now approaching similar levels of peril. It is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires a counter-offensive.”

We’ll be hearing a lot more rhetoric like this as this new, more totalitarian structure of global capitalism gradually develops … probably a good idea to listen carefully, and assume the New Normals mean exactly what they say.

CJ Hopkins
May 3, 2021

How Much is Enough?

I have been thinking about integrity and honesty, and frankly should humanity even continue, but that is another thread. In my thinking, I keep coming back to the same question: How much or little cheating is enough? Or stated another way?

How much of a lie makes you a liar?
How much cheating do you have to do to be a cheater?
How much do you need to steal for you to be considered a thief?
How much infidelity do you need to be considered an adulterer?
How much fraud to you need to commit for it to be criminal?
How much of the truth needs to be changed for it to be untrue?
How much shit exactly, does something need to have to be considered a shit sandwich?
How dead must a person be to be considered murdered?
How pregnant do you have to be to be considered pregnant?

OK, the last two were off topic but the answer is “any”..

Any amount of lying makes you a liar.
Any amount of cheating makes you a cheater.
Any amount of stealing makes you a thief.
Any amount of infidelity makes you an adulterer.
Any amount of fraud makes it a crime.
Any amount of untruth makes it false.

These are step functions: it is either 100% or 0%. There is no scale to truth, honesty, integrity, character, or fidelity. These are virtues and you either possess them or you do not. To paraphrase Yoda, “You are or you are not, there is no middle.” To accept a little fraud, lying, cheating, and stealing is to accept a lot.

So, you see if there were any lies, cheating, stealing, or fraud in the past election, it makes the whole election false, untrue, and bogus. Essentially, any amount of shit makes it a shit sandwich inedible except for the ones who want to force it down our throats. So, those people who keep lying, cheating, stealing, and have no integrity need to have a “come to Jesus” meeting real soon with the consequences of their actions.

Two quotes come to mind, both by Benjamin Franklin, “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters,” and “We gave you a Republic, if you can keep it.” So, as you can see by letting this situation stand we are no longer a virtuous people and neither deserve freedom nor a Republic. Instead we are now lead by masters intent on keeping us in pens and cages. For me, there is some shit I shall not eat.

Intolerable Acts

There are some people who are stunned at the idea that we might have a fraudulently elected president. I am in that category. Why? The idea that one of the last bastions against tyranny, the ballot box, is gone leaves Americans with few methods to redress their grievances. What are we supposed to do next time, vote harder?

But the idea that the presidency, the crown jewel of political power in the world can be sold is intolerable to many. Intolerable means simply that – cannot be tolerated. If the office can be openly stolen once, it can be openly stolen in the future.

At last count, over 60% of voters thought the election was rigged, which includes Leftists. Since they felt that Orange Man was literally the most evil and fascist person ever (rather than the mid-1990s moderate his policies showed him to be) cheating to Leftists is justified. The ends always justify the means to the Left. They’re happy the election was rigged. Now, they will reap what they have sown.

Michigan Vote Flip Happened Due to Computer Program, Not Human Error

OK I am just dying to see how the Left is going to try an fact check this out of existence? This is huge. There literally is now a smoking gun, with finger prints, and a confession now indicating that, no it is not humans, but machines that are flipping votes. This my friends now opens the door to do a forensic audit in every battleground state that runs Dominion machines, as well as the other 20 odd states (including California) that uses the machines.

Michigan Vote Flip Happened Due to Computer Program, Not Human Error

In the map below, States with blue a circle means Dominion runs the whole state. Grey states means they run 1 or more counties. In Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, of course they are running in the largest Democrat controlled counties/cities… Nice. Also, some are questioning California’s vote count, and actually believe that there are upwards of 3 million flipped / phantom votes, and that in actuality, California went RED!

More Fraud Analysis form Georgia and its fake recount

More fun in Georgia on acceptance rates of mail in ballots. Typically (historically) the rejection rate of mail-in ballots in Georgia is 5.7%, but lo and behold in the 2020 Presidential election if dropped to 0.4%.. hum So you get 50% more ballots and your rejection rate magically drops?

Again, this is from Crowder’s MugClub and Louder from Crowder (a humor site), but they are just using public data to conclude fraud. Here is the analysis of Georgia

Then there was the sending home of canvassers in Fulton County saying they were going to stop the count, then one hour later started counting again! Again, they turning off of the voting machines due to a pipe burst that never happened.  Then again, Biden gets a huge dump of votes.. amazing..

This is pretty funny in some places as well. Especially the jokes about Russia hacking the election…

Pennsylvania Mailed out 1.8 Million Mail-In Ballots, Got Back 2.5 Million

Gettysburg, PA… the turning place of the US Civil War and no coincidence that Giuliani chose this location to echo the immortal words of Abraham Lincoln, “It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.” This is precisely what Trump has pledged to do and has done.

Here is a recap of the claims Mayor Giuliani made of the fraud in Pennsylvania, which by all measures, is monumental. Only someone who believes the Earth is flat could deny that at least in PA this election was rigged in Biden’s favor and should be handed over to Trump along with the 20 Electoral Votes.

Note: Of course lame stream media is now claiming that no, 3 million ballots were sent out? I do not think Giuliana would make such a rookie mistake as not verifying the numbers?

Trump’s Legal Strategy Update: A Sun Tzu move

OK, everyone is in a tizzy about Sidney Powell’s apparent departure from the Rudy Giuliani / Jenna Ellis legal team is not to be unexpected. As Sun Tzu once said, “The victorious make many calculations prior to the fight, for every battle is won before it is ever fought.”

With this said, their strategy is becoming more straightforward. The ultimate goal is to get these claims to a very friend Supreme Court, but you cannot do that with proof and there are two time arch here.

First is the easy proofs of mail in ballot fraud, over-counts, denying viewing of ballots, two tier voting standards, double / triple / quadruple ballot counting, dead voters, voters voting in two states, and just plan ballot stuffing. This is what Team Giuliani / Ellis is undertaking.  Case in point: In Wayne county Michigan, there are 198,000 ballots logged with no registered votes where 97% goes to one candidate and the voting tallies over 100%. This is a statistical impossibility. On these cases just need a preponderance of evidence to show voter fraud existing, and the vote (or ballots) can be nullified, are at least not certified.

On the longer arc, which is the Dominion Systems debacle, there is more risk because the burden of proof may take longer and also involve treason. Yes, treason. And, Sidney Powell is licensed to prosecute treason cases in a military court. This is where felony charges of systemic voter fraud happens, and will take longer to discover and prosecute. While she might be able to cast doubts on the election, proving it may be too heave a lift in the short amount of time Ms. Powell has to work in, but then again, she is HIGHLY motivated and incredibly intelligent.  Case in point, the are finding that Trump was getting 0.7 vote for every vote he received and Biden was getting 1.5 votes for every vote he received. Plus, there is just the massive data dumps at 4:00 AM.

Lastly, you ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS have to follow the money. Remember, Giuliani broke the mob in NYC. Something thought IMPOSSIBLE to do, and Powell got Gen. Flynn acquitted. By separating their efforts but sharing data and complaints, they essentially are attacking the enemy on two fronts (um, think of Germany in WWII). There is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT in my mind that Trump won, and in a landslide.

THIS MAY BE THE LARGEST AND MOST CORRUPT SCANDAL IN US HISTORY. And we have had some whoppers. There is a preponderance of proof, even with all the attempts to cover it up. The Democrats were just too confident in their schemes and did not realize that Trump would actually garner 75 million votes. He broke their system by his overwhelming win, and this put them doing stupid stuff.

In closing, Buddha once stated, “Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth.”  The truth will have out.

US Federal Election Commission Chairman: You got fraud

So, here it comes. Saw Trey Trainor state unequivocally that fraud was taking place by pollsters actions in various cities. Then looked up the FACT Checks that say that is not what he said, or the FEC does not regulate fraud.. wow, wrong. The main stream media is so in bed with Beijing Biden that it is laughable. They literally have no credibility anymore. It is like having a communist run state news. Here is the link too:

Pennsylvania Moves from Circuit Court to Supreme Court

Recently, the Trump campaign’s suit in the 3rd Circuit Court (Federal) got thrown out, which is EXACTLY what they wanted (as I stated in my strategy statement). Now, Team Trump can move this to the Supreme Court with 50 witnesses, affidavits, and other testimony to put their claim that 682,777 were cast illegally for Biden. This is NOT including the Dominion software which puts in another 180,000+ vote injection.

The statement below explains… one down, 5 to go.

Hammer & Scorecard are Real

OK, the thing I love about the truth and proof it that it is always out there. You may deny, decry, and vilify it, but the truth is the truth, and it will not long stay hidden. So, when it came to the 2020 Elections, way, way back in November 6th, 2020, I remember that someone mentioned a program called Hammer & Scorecard and I saw a video on YouTube (which has been deleted) about it. I thought it was incredible that such a program existed until Major General McInerney said it did, and was actually a part of it in the Department of Defense (DoD). At that time, I sent out an email stating “this is how you can game the system” and “the fix was in.” In any case, here is the video with Gen. McInerney explaining what Hammer & Scorecard is: Still, this was just one man’s accusation, but no concrete proof.. and well, to change anything you need proof.  Enter Mike Lindell.

The man may be a little too enthusiastic, but you have to love his effort. In follow up to Absolute Proof (the video), he has not created another video that a forensic data scientist goes through and describes in detail how, when, where and to what extend the election data was altered to favor Biden, and the main culprit was China. Remember all the trade secrets Hillary sold to the Chines Communist Party (CCP)? Where here you go. Go to the 1 hour 32 minute mark of the video found on this page: this is where the details analysis of the voting flips happened.

Amazingly, Trump may have surpassed 90 million votes nationwide as every jurisdiction in the US where there was electronic voting and tabulation was stealing and flipping votes, and because Trump’s tallies were so huge that had to hammer away manually with the results. Taken together with Dr. Frank’s assessment of electronic election tampering, there should be no doubt to the absolute fraud this election was all about. This is a stolen election, period. As always, I stand your defiant American Dissident.

The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth

So, why does Trump have any chance of overturning the results in PA, GA, WI, MI, AZ and NV? One woman: Sidney Powell.

I always knew she was a firebrand, coming from Texas, but little did I know this about her integrity and abilities. You might like to read this:

She has often been quoted as saying: “I would not say it unless I can prove it.” If I were the DEMS, I would be pooping in my pants because she have made some really serious claims.  Now love, show us the proof!

As Buddha one said, “Three things cannot long stay hidden: the sun, the moon and the truth.”

The Legal Process of US Presidential Election

Thought I would put in writing what people are missing in the media. The Fourth Estate (yes, that is what the media is called supposedly to balance the other 3 branches of government) has totally been missing the point when they say the Trump lawyers keep losing in the lower courts. That is what they want to do, and rapidly. Why? Because then it gets moved UP to the higher courts, then to the State Supreme Courts, the Federal District Courts and FINALLY to the Supreme Court.

There is  some chance at the State Supreme Court level or Federal District Court level that the evidence is enough to disallow certain votes (i.e. mail in ballots) which may be enough to overturn one or two State results.  Barring that, you now go to the Supreme Court. There, a whole bevy of issues: mail in ballots, barring Republican canvassers, mass dumps of ballots after the cutoff dates, software manipulations of the Dominion machines, etc., etc., etc., will be heard. If even a small of amount of these claims can be proven, and that is a heavy lift, the election can be voided by the Court and sent to the legislature. Not, that one only has to prove there is malfeasance in the election. Notice the DEMs cannot offer a challenge and disprove it, so in the Supreme Court is really is just a one-sided case. Proof trumps everything.

Now the fun starts. Moving the election to the legislator is known as a Contingent Election, and it has happened 3 times in the past. In the United States, a contingent election is the procedure used to elect the president or vice president in the event that no candidate for one or both of these offices wins an absolute majority of votes in the Electoral College or if the election is voided. A presidential contingent election is decided by a special vote of the United States House of Representatives, while a vice-presidential contingent election is decided by a vote of the United States Senate. During a contingent election in the House, each state’s delegation casts one en bloc vote to determine the president, rather than a vote from each representative. Senators, on the other hand, cast votes individually for vice president.

A Presidential candidate must receive an absolute majority of state delegation votes (currently 26 votes) to become the president-elect. The House continues balloting until it elects a president. As a consequence of the state delegation voting method, the party that holds the majority in the House could still lose the contingent election if the minority party holds the majority of state delegations.[5] The District of Columbia, which is not a state, does not receive a vote. At this time the Republicans how a majority in 29 delegations, so the vote could be 29-21 for Trump. The incoming House would vote next year.

As example, let’s use Georgia. Georgia has a Republican majority in the House, that means the House will most likely cast a vote for the Republican candidate.. one vote per State… it is NOT done on the State level. So, in Georgia’s case, there are 14 Representatives with 10 being Republican and 4 Democrat coming in the next session (which will decide the President). They chose to vote amongst the top 3 Presidential candidates and the winner gets the vote in the House. Note, California with 53 Reps, gets only 1 vote, presumably for Biden. So, in 29 States there are more Republican Reps than Dem, even though the Total House has 5 more Democrats that Republicans… the founders again were geniuses. Get to the Supreme Court, get to the House, Trump gets a second term.. and a LOT of people go to jail (hopefully).  In the Senate, the Vice President gets voted on.. one vote per Senator with the sitting VP casting the tying vote.

Fraud, Collusion, Audits and Red Flags you can see from outer space

In auditing you look for red flags. They are weird bits in the data that suggest something shifty is going on. You flag those weird things so you can delve into them further. One flag does not necessarily mean there is fraud. Weird things and honest mistakes happen. A few flags mean stupidity or dishonesty. But a giant pile of red flags means that there is bad stuff going on and people should be in jail. Here is a link (a fairly long read) with the details of the multitude of red flags a forensic audit would uncover:

I am more offended by how ham fisted, clumsy, and audacious the fraud to elect him is than the idea of Joe Biden being president. I think Joe Biden is a corrupt idiot, however, I think America would survive him like we’ve survived previous idiot administrations. However, what is potentially fatal for America is half the populace believing that their elections are hopelessly rigged and they’re eternally fucked. And now, however this shakes out in court, that’s exactly what half the country is going to think.

People are pissed off, and rightfully so

I can say without hesitation that skullduggery is afoot, and if an actual real investigation happens they will be able to prove it. These people were just to blatantly confident in their schemes.

Alleged Electronic Vote Fraud by the Numbers

Here is a listing of the number of alleged switched and lost votes that Sydney Powell is claiming that effected Trump’s count in the various states. In total, 512,095 votes were considered switched, and 2,865,757 were claimed to be deleted in several states. Most of the “incidences” where with Dominion Software systems. Remember those “glitches” and suspended vote tallies? combine this with the tens of thousands of fraudulent mail-in ballots, and this is not a case of a few instances of fraud, but a total take over of our electoral system. This is a wide-spread and pervasive attempt to usurp the Presidential election. Why these claims may be baseless, the is an ever increasing amount of statistical and factual evident that a great deal of foul play was afoot. If even a tiny bit of this is true, Trump wins. If all if it is true, he won in a landslide. Please refer to my “defying the laws of physics” email. Trump was right, Biden was the absolute worst candidate, ever. Taken together with the estimation that 2 to 4 million mail in ballots should be thrown out, Trump also won the popular vote. Any way you slice it, this election is far from over.

The REAL Electoral Map

Here is the updated map. NV, MI, AZ and PA in court… WI & GA in audits / recounts. MN to follow with lawsuits. Bottom line, Trump won in a landslide. Add 2.7MM to Trump, flip 485K from Biden to Trump in total. Trump wins popular vote too. Trump to get at least 304 Electoral Votes, maybe 310.

Statistical anomalies and irregularities on this election?

Here’s the question no top Democrat wants to hear this week:

“If you believe Trump is and has been an existential, Hitler-like risk, would you agree Democrats should have done everything in their power to rig the election? If not, why be so cowardly and unpatriotic?”

Not saying there is fraud, but man there are a lot of statistical improbabilities and irregularities that have NEVER happened before in a modern presidential election. Of course, there is a need to verify that nothing unsorted happened, if at all possible.

Interesting step functions in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania

And wow Pennsylvania was the worst… the statistical probability of the right quarter of this graphic has NEVER happened before.

And in Michigan…

More interesting step functions in Michigan and Wisconsin. Nice step functions.. ALL going for Biden? Really? Improbable maybe, impossible, absolutely.

This is a statistical improbability if true

And speaking of mail in ballots.. more were requested by Republicans than Democrats in both in Michigan and Wisconsin but seemingly more Democrats actually mailed theirs in?

Note: Benford’s Law follows this principle: Benford’s law, also called the Newcomb–Benford law, the law of anomalous numbers, or the first-digit law, is an observation about the frequency distribution of leading digits in many real-life sets of numerical data. The law states that in many naturally occurring collections of numbers, the leading digit is likely to be small.[1] In sets that obey the law, the number 1 appears as the leading significant digit about 30% of the time, while 9 appears as the leading significant digit less than 5% of the time. If the digits were distributed uniformly, they would each occur about 11.1% of the time.[2] Benford’s law also makes predictions about the distribution of second digits, third digits, digit combinations, and so on.

It is used to determine financial fraud.. more here:

For a complete outline of these anomalies by a highly partisan site go here:

Not saying there is fraud, but there sure are a LOT of irregularities.. that well, will go to the courts!

Biden’s Campaign and Results defy the Laws of Physics

I learned a long time ago when anything defies the laws of physics, you have to look closely at what is going on. This is true with Biden’s campaign, or lake thereof. If you told me at ANY TIME in US history that a candidate, no matter how popular, could forego any campaigning and win, well that is defying the laws of physics. If you also told me that his opponent was having huge, multiple rallies over a period of 3 weeks and the polls did not move at all, that is defying the laws of physics. If you told me that tens of thousands of votes cast in swing states would only be for one candidate and NO OTHER down ballot candidates, that is defying the laws of physics. If you told me that Americans would willingly and overwhelming chose control and constraint over freedom and choice, that is defying the laws of physics. These are just assertions, not proof of anything.

Now we have math nerds telling us that yes, it was defying the laws of physics or math at least:

A little Civics Lesson:

As rallies were scheduled to take place in key battleground areas to demand only legal votes were counted, the major networks announced Biden-Harris were the winners. Apparently, they are under the impression that they decide election results. They do not. On December 14, electors chosen by state legislators cast their votes. No one else but the state legislators have that right. (Article II, Sec. 1,§2 of the Constitution). Certainly not the press, nor state boards of elections, secretaries of state, governors, nor courts.

If they have reason to believe the elections in their states were unlawfully conducted and the results fraudulent, they can act to override them. (You can see a detailed history of this section of the Constitution in this fine article by Daniel Horowitz.) The Wisconsin, Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania  legislatures are majority Republican. At first glance these states — particularly the precincts in Milwaukee, Detroit, Pittsburgh, and Philadelphia — are the most suspect.

Is there ample evidence of fraud sufficient to have altered the will of the legal voters in these states? It sure looks that way.

What if There’s no Winner Declared by Inauguration Day?

There seems to be a lot of assertions that in such a case Nancy Pelosi will be the interim president. Nope. Should that eventuality occur, the House votes for an interim president and the Senate for an interim vice president. (The House votes are by state — one vote each — and the Republicans hold a majority of 26 states. Our founders were geniuses. Never, ever, ever forget that!)

Circle the wagons, it is about to get criminal.

Massive voter fraud uncovered in Harris County, Texas

By M. Dowling November 2, 2020

Former Houston City Councilman and poll watcher Andrew C. Burks, a lifelong Democrat, came forward to private investigators to express his belief that the long-running Democrat voter fraud operation in Harris County, Texas is still in operation in the 2020 election.

Andrew Burks

Burks explains based on his experience that electronic voting machines sometimes still have the ballots in them, meaning ballots were not counted. He explains how he has received evidence of dead people voting in Harris County, the National File reported.

Harris County, Texas is conducting 24-hour voting beginning Thursday, even as the county is engulfed in a voter fraud scandal that ensnared the Joe Biden campaign’s recent Texas political director Dallas Jones.

One Biden campaign staffer was fired after he was implicated in an illegal ballot harvesting operation.

Vote count discrepancies are already being reported in Harris County.

The FBI is investigating, for whatever the good that will do. I mean, they’re so busy investigating a Trump caravan following the Biden-Harris bus, and all.

Investigators Found Corruption

According to the National File, twenty private investigators have uncovered a great deal. What has been uncovered is a group of masterminds wanting to destroy the Texas voting voice. Some of the masterminds include Democrat County Commissioner Rodney Ellis and Democrat State Senator Boris Miles. They have two captains, Gerald Womack and Dallas Jones.

Jones was hired by the Biden campaign to run the Biden Texas operation. These captains have scores of paid vote harvesters working for them. Vote harvesting is a second-degree felony under the Texas Election Code. This is a criminal operation that these Democrat elected officials are running. Dallas was allegedly fired by the Biden campaign.

If Texas turns blue, it will be wheeling and dealing like this.

They harvest ballots by mail from nursing homes, homeless centers, door to door in poor neighborhoods, often dressed as Census workers.  Also, they offer $50 gift cards in front of stores asking people to take ballots by mail, acquired from the above, to sign and mail at a local post office. They hold ballots by mail in several locations where people forge signatures on the collected ballots by mail.

Evidence has been presented to the local DA, Kim Ogg, who received a substantial amount of political contributions from Soros funded organizations in her election in 2018.

They mailed ballots to the elderly without requests in violation of Texas law.

In the meantime, the Democrats are implementing their massive election voter fraud scheme, mostly in open sight. One arrest would go miles in stopping this election fraud scheme. The drive-through locations are located primarily in Democrat areas. This also violates the 14th Amendment.”

Andrew Burks explains how he PERSONALLY was given info proving dead people’s names are used to vote.

The Fix was In

There really was no way that Trump is going to win, no matter what, even if he did get most of the votes legally. Either way, our Democracy is in shambles primarily because of the DEMOCRATS.

The election this November isn’t going to be as much about Joe Biden and Donald Trump, but more a defining moment deciding the future of our country. Deciding if we are going to remain a free nation where elections matter or whether we’re going to become a third-world country.

This election won’t be fair. The Democrats have already been stacking the deck, pushing the vote-by-mail process, using the virus as the excuse and claiming polling places disenfranchise the poor. They also continue to use the virus to keep the country held down and preventing it from emerging out of the financial hole we’ve been placed in. Those points are valid and true.

What is also true is the big three tech companies have for years, but accelerated in 2020, their form of censorship and manipulation. Google, Facebook and Twitter are doing all they can to control content away from conservative ideals and push their liberal agenda using the full strength of their monopoly-controlled information source.

This is a good opinion piece on what will most likely happen now.

Take Action! We are Winning This!

Two new bills (SB97 and HB16) have been introduced in Texas in both houses requesting a forensic audit of the 13 largest counties in Texas: Harris, Dallas, Bexar, Tarrant, Travis, Collin, Denton, Hidalgo, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson and Cameron. Please support this bill by contacting your State Representative.

1. Find your Texas Representative with this link: Here

2. Call, email, mail or visit your Texas State Representative to tell them how you feel.

3. Spread the word and get as many people as you can to help take back our elections and stop the fraud!

Success! No More Signatures Needed!
Contact your State Representative to
Support SB97 & HB16!

Two new bills (SB97 and HB16) have been introduced in Texas in both houses requesting a forensic audit of the 13 largest counties in Texas: Harris, Dallas, Bexar, Tarrant, Travis, Collin, Denton, Hidalgo, Fort Bend, El Paso, Montgomery, Williamson and Cameron. Please support this bill by contacting your State Representative.

1. Find your Texas Representative with this link: Here

2. Call, email, mail or visit your Texas State Representative to tell them how you feel.

3. Spread the word and get as many people as you can to help take back our elections and stop the fraud!